Compared Study of Vascular Cell Response to Mg-Zn-Y-Nd and WE43 as Biodegradable Stents

Article Preview

Abstract:

To evaluate biocompatibility of Mg-Zn-Y-Nd alloy as vascular stent material, its influence on cytotoxicity, cell migration, cell chemotaxis and NO release of vascular endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells were tested compared with WE43 alloy. Results show that Mg-Zn-Y-Nd alloy degraded slower and exhibited better cell viability and NO release than WE43; WE43 showed more significant effect on stimulating endothelial cells migration; Both alloys showed nonsignificant effect on vascular smooth muscle cells migration and chemotaxis. Mg-Zn-Y-Nd alloy exhibited great biocompatibility to vascular cells.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 915-916)

Pages:

962-967

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] G.X. Wang, Y. Shen, Y. Cao, Q.S. Yu and G. Robert: IET Nanobiotechnol. Vol. 6 (2007), p.102.

Google Scholar

[2] C.J. Tang, G.X. Wang, X. Wu, Z.G. Li, Y. Shen, James C.M. Lee and Q.S. Yu: J. Vasc. Surg., Vol. 53 (2011), p.461.

Google Scholar

[3] C.F. Luo, Y.M. Zheng, Z.J. Diao, J. H. Qiu and G.X. Wang: J. Med. Biol. Eng. Vol. 31 (2 011), p.310.

Google Scholar

[4] Frank Witte: Acta Biomater. Vol. 6 (2010), p.1680.

Google Scholar

[5] C. Di Mario, P. Barlis and J. Tanigawa: Eur. Heart J. Vol. 28 (2007), p.2319.

Google Scholar

[6] Wang B, Guan S, Wang J, et al.: Mater. Sci. Eng., B, 2011, 176(20): 1673-1678.

Google Scholar

[7] Mao L, Yuan G, Wang S: Mater. Lett. Vol. 88(2012), 88: p.1.

Google Scholar

[8] Zhang S, Zhang X, Zhao C, Li J, Song Y, Xie C, Tao H, Zhang Y, He Y and Jiang Y: Acta Biomater. Vol. 6 ( 2010), p.626.

Google Scholar

[9] M Klagsbrun, E. R Edelman: Arteriosclerosis Vol. 9 (1989), p.269.

Google Scholar

[10] D. A Grosenbaugh, M. S Amoss, D. M Hood, S. J Morgan and J. D Williams: Am. J. Physiol. Vol. 255 (1988), p. C447.

Google Scholar

[11] J. A Fagin, J. S Forrester: Trends Cardiovasc. Med. Vol. 2 (1992), p.90.

Google Scholar

[12] H Abedi, I Zachary: Cardiovasc. Res. Vol. 30 (1995), p.544.

Google Scholar

[13] Goetsch K P, Niesler C U: Analytical biochemistry Vol. 411(2011), p.158.

Google Scholar

[14] Jeremy JY, Rowe D, Emsley AM and Newby AC: Cardiovasc Res Vol. 43 (1999), P. 43.

Google Scholar

[15] ISO E. 10993-5: Biological evaluation of medical devices- Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity. (2009).

DOI: 10.2345/9781570203558.ch1

Google Scholar

[16] Drynda A, Deinet N, Braun N: J Biomed. Mater. Res. A Vol. 91(2009), p.360.

Google Scholar

[17] F. Feyerabend, J. Fischer, J. Holtz, F. Witte, R. Willumeit, H. Drücker and N. Hort: Acta Biomater. Vol. 6(2010), P. 1834.

Google Scholar

[18] Schaffer J E, Nauman E A, Stanciu L A: Acta biomater. Vol. 9(2013), p.8574.

Google Scholar