For Libraries For Publication Open Access Downloads About Us Contact Us
Paper Titles
The Effect of TaN Interlayer on the Performance of Pt-Ir Protective Coatings in Glass Molding Process
p.869
Thermal Stability of Al2O3 Coated Low Transition Temperature Glass
p.875
Presentation of a New Method for Determination of Diffusion Coefficients of Gaseous Pollutants in Cladding Wall Materials Indoors
p.881
Macroporous Silicon Electrochemical Etching for Gas Diffusion Layers Applications: Effect of Processing Temperature
p.887
Thermal Diffusivity of Traditional and Innovative Sheet Steels
p.893
Electroless Ni-P Composites with ZrO2: Preparation, Characterization, Thermal Treatment
p.899
Improvement of the Electrochemical Properties in Nano-Sized Al2O3 and AlF3-Coated LiFePO4 Cathode Materials
p.906
Characterization of Electrolytically Deposited CdSe on Ti Substrates
p.912
The Effect of Al2O3 and Li2O on the Anatase to Rutile Phase Transformation
p.918

Thermal Diffusivity of Traditional and Innovative Sheet Steels

Article Preview

Abstract:

The low carbon steels, used for the production of car bodies by deep drawing, are gradually substituted by high strength steels for vehicle weight reduction. The drawn car body components are joined by welding and the welded points undergo a reduction of the local tensile strength. In developing an accurate welding process model, able to optimized process parameters and to predict the final local microstructure, a significant improvement can be given by the knowledge of the welded steels thermal diffusivity at different temperatures. The laser-flash method has been used to compare the thermal diffusivity of two traditional deep drawing steels, two high strength steels already in common usage, i.e. a Dual Phase (DP) steel and a TRansformation Induced Plasticity (TRIP) steel, and one experimental high-Mn austenitic TWIP (Twinning Induced Plasticity) steel. The low carbon steels, at low temperatures, have a thermal diffusivity that is 4-5 times larger than the TWIP steel. Their thermal diffusivity decreases by increasing temperature while the TWIP steel shows an opposite behaviour, albeit with a lesser slope, so that above 700°C the TWIP thermal diffusivity is larger. The different behaviour of the TWIP steel in respect to the ferritic deep drawing steels arises from its non ferro-magnetic austenitic structure. The DP and TRIP steels show intermediate values, their diffusivity being lower than that of the traditional deep drawing steels; this latter fact probably arises from their higher alloy content and more complex microstructure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Diffusion in Solids and Liquids V View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Defect and Diffusion Forum (Volumes 297-301)

Pages:

893-898

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.297-301.893

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

April 2010

Authors:

Elena Campagnoli, Paolo Matteis, Giovanni M.M. Mortarino, Giorgio Scavino

Keywords:

DP, IF, Steel, Thermal Diffusivity, TRIP, TWIP

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] A. DiMatteo, G. Lovicu, M. Desanctis, R. Valentini and A. Solina: Metall. Ital. Vol. 98 (2006), p.37.

Google Scholar

[2] G. Scavino, F. D'Aiuto, P. Matteis, P. Russo Spena and D. Firrao: Proc. EPD Symp. (TMS Ann. Meet., San Francisco, USA, 2009), TMS: Warrendale, USA, 2009, p.111.

Google Scholar

[3] S.C. Hong and K.S. Lee: Mater Sci. Eng. A Vol. 323, (2002), p.148.

Google Scholar

[4] N. Tsuchida, E. Baba, K. Nagai and Y. Tomota: Acta Mater. 53 (2005), p.265.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Maggi. and G. Scavino: Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Fracture, Torino, Italy, 2005, p.522.

Google Scholar

[6] P. Matteis, E. Campagnoli, D. Firrao and G. Ruscica: Int. J. Thermal Sci. Vol. 47 (2008), p.695.

Google Scholar

[7] E. Campagnoli, D. Firrao, P. Matteis, G.M.M. Mortarino, M. Pavese, G. Ruscica, R. Gerosa, B. Rivolta and G. Silva: Proc. 31° Conv. Naz. AIM, Milano, Italy, 2006, p.1.

Google Scholar

[8] S. Saritas: Metal Powder Report Vol. 58 (2003), p.36.

Google Scholar

[9] G. Taher, S. Ben and N. Yacoubi: Tribology Int. Vol. 42 (2009), p.391.

Google Scholar

[10] C. Hamilton, S. Dymec and A. Sommers: Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu. Vol. 48 (2008), p.1120.

Google Scholar

[11] A.E. Ozgur, B. Yalcin and M. Koru: Mater. Design 30 (2009), p.414.

Google Scholar

[12] K.M. Boubaker, M. Bouhafs and N. Yacoubi: NDT&E Int. 36 (2003), p.547.

Google Scholar

[13] W.J. Parker, R.J. Jenkins, C.P. Butler and G.L. Abbot: J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 32 (1961), p.1679.

Google Scholar

[14] D. Firrao; P. Matteis; G.M.M. Mortarino and G. Scavino, Proc. 22° Conv. Naz. Trattamenti Termici, Salsomaggiore, Italy, 2009, paper n. 35.

Google Scholar

[15] Y.S. Touloukian, R.W. Powell, C.Y. Ho, and M.C. Nicolau: Thermophysical Propertis of Matter Vol. 10, IF/PLENUM, New York (1973), p.82.

Google Scholar

[16] A. Rudajevova and J. Burianel: J. Phase Equilibria Vol. 22 (2001), p.560.

Google Scholar

[17] R.H. Bogaard, P.D. Desai, H.H. Li and C.Y. Ho: Thermochim. Acta Vol. 218 (1993), p.373.

Google Scholar

[18] S. Rudtsch, H.P. Ebert, F. Hemberger, G. Barth, R. Brandt, U. Gross, W. Hohenauer, K. Jaenicke-Roessler, E. Kaschnitz, E. Pfaff, W. Possnecker, G. Pottlacher, M. Rhode and B. Wilthan: Int. J. Thermophys. Vol. 26 (2005), p.855.

DOI: 10.1007/s10765-005-5582-6

Google Scholar

[19] J. Clark and R. Tye: High Temp. High Press. Vol. 35/36 (2003/2004), p.1.

Google Scholar

[20] H.J. Solter: High Temp. High Press. Vol. 19 (1987), p.455.

Google Scholar

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open access content, terms of the Creative Commons licensing CC-BY are applied.
Scientific.Net is a registered trademark of Trans Tech Publications Ltd.