Optimization of Automatic TIG Welding Parameters of AISI 304L ASS Welds Using Response Surface Methodology

Article Preview

Abstract:

The present study, aims to investigate, under welding parameters of current, voltage and gas flow, the effects of welding parameters on tensile strength of AISI 304L ASS welds using response surface methodology (RSM). The RSM and variance analysis (ANOVA) were used to check the validity of quadratic regression model and to determine the significant parameter affecting tensile strength of welds. Hence, ANOVA clearly revealed that the contribution of each factor is 71.40% of voltage, 19.2% of current and 8.30% of gas flow. It was found that combined contributions of welding parameters contributes significantly to the metallurgical changes by varying fractions, morphology and grain size of metallic compounds. Furthermore, the optimum automatic welding conditions lead to produce the best possible weld quality in the range of our experiment using desirability function approach for single response of RSM optimization factors, in which it concluded that tensile strength components are influenced principally by voltage. Finally, the ranges for best welding conditions are proposed for serial industrial production.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

319-333

Citation:

Online since:

January 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Gousmine, D. Miroud, M.F. Benlamnouar, B. Demri, A. Younes, Study of Composite with Metallic Matrix WC/W2C–20W–20Ni Realized by Spontaneous Infiltration of the Bronze Alloy Cu–30Mn–3P, Springer, Applied Mechanics, Behavior of Materials, and Engineering Systems (2015) 365-374.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41468-3_30

Google Scholar

[2] M. Taouinet, N. E. Kamel, S. Lebaili, Diffusion Bonding Between Zircaloy-4 and 304L Stainless Steel in the Presence of a Eutectic, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 28: 1327–1334, (2013).

DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2013.822982

Google Scholar

[3] M.F. Benlamnouar, M. Hadji, R. Badji, N. Bensaid, T. Saadi, Y. Laib dit Laksir, S. Senouci. Optimization of TIG Welding Process Parameters for X70-304L Dissimilar Joint Using Taguchi Method. Solid State Phenomena, Vol. 297 (2019) 51-61.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.297.51

Google Scholar

[4] S. Ningshen, M. Sakairi, Corrosion degradation of AISI type 304L stainless steel for application in nuclear reprocessing plant, J Solid State Electrochem (2015) 19:3533–3542.

DOI: 10.1007/s10008-015-2891-y

Google Scholar

[5] B. Z. Margolin, I. P. Kursevich, A. A. Sorokin, N. K. Vasina, V. S. Neustroev, Embrittlement and fracture toughness of highly irradiated austenitic steels for vessel internals of wwer type reactors. Part 2. Relation between irradiation swelling And irradiation embrittlement. Physical and mechanical behavior. Strength of Materials, Vol. 42, No. 2, (2010).

DOI: 10.1007/s11223-010-9201-9

Google Scholar

[6] G Dilip Maruthi, Purushotham, Rashmi R, Low Temperature Embrittlement studies on Stainless Steel 304LN TIG Welds, Materials Today: Proceedings 5 (2018) 2891–2900.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.01.083

Google Scholar

[7] N. Bensaid, M. Hadji, R. Badji, M.F. Benlamnouar, T. Saadi, Y. Laib dit Laksir, S. Senouci. Microstructure and Mechanical Behavior of AISI 430 FSS Welds Produced with Different Elemental Metal Powder Addition. Solid State Phenomena, Vol. 297 ( 2019) 195-203.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.297.195

Google Scholar

[8] N. Chandrasekhar, M. Vasudevan, Intelligent Modeling for Optimization of A-TIG Welding Process, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 25: 1341–1350, (2010).

DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2010.529584

Google Scholar

[9] Vasudevan Muthukumaran, Nagaraju Sa, P. Vasantharaja, N. Chandrasekhar, T.Jayakumar, Optimization of Welding Process Parameters for 9Cr-1Mo Steel Using RSM and GA, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Volume 31, Issue 3 319-327, (2016).

DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2015.1025974

Google Scholar

[10] Berkani, S., Yallese, M., Boulanouar, L., & Mabrouki, T. (2015). Statistical analysis of AISI304 austenitic stainless steel machining using Ti (C, N)/Al2O3/TiN CVD coated carbide tool. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 6(4), 539-552.

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2015.4.004

Google Scholar

[11] Zahia, H., Athmane, Y., Lakhdar, B., & Tarek, M. (2015). On the application of response, surface methodology for predicting and optimizing surface roughness and cutting forces in hard turning by PVD coated insert. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 6(2), 267-284.

DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2014.10.003

Google Scholar

[12] Xuemei Sun, Guoqun Zhao , Cunsheng Zhang, Yanjin Guan, Anjiang Gao, Optimal Design of Second-Step Welding Chamber for a Condenser Tube Extrusion Die Based on the Response Surface Method and the Genetic Algorithm, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 28: 823–834, (2013).

DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2012.736657

Google Scholar

[13] ASME. Qualification Standard for Welding and Brazing, An International Code of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Committee on welding and Brazing, USA, (2010).

DOI: 10.1115/1.859872.ch25

Google Scholar

[14] ASTM International E08-03, Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials, American National Standard, E8/E8M, (2010).

Google Scholar

[15] Aouici H, Yallese MA, Belbah A, Ameur MF, Elbah M (2013) Experimental investigation of cutting parameters influence on surface roughness and cutting forces in hard turning of X38CrMoV5-1 with CBN tool. Sadhana 38(3):429–445.

DOI: 10.1007/s12046-013-0147-z

Google Scholar

[16] V. N. Gaitonde, S. R. Karnik, M. Faustino and J. P. Davim, Machinability analysis in turning tungsten-copper composite for application in EDM electrodes, I. J. Refractory Metals & Hard Materials, 27 (2009) 754-763.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2009.10.002

Google Scholar

[17] Haijin W, Jie S, Jianfeng L, Laixiao L, Nan L (2016) Evaluation of cutting force and cutting temperature in milling carbon fiberreinforced polymer composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(9):1517–1525.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-7479-2

Google Scholar

[18] Montgomery D C;Design and Analysis of experiments.4th ed. John Wiley and Sons.New York, (1997).

Google Scholar

[19] Kumar P, Chauhan SR (2015) Machinability study on finish turning of AISI H13 hot working die tool steel with cubic boron nitride (CBN) cutting tool inserts using response surface methodology (RSM). Arab J Sci Eng 40:1471–1485.

DOI: 10.1007/s13369-015-1606-0

Google Scholar

[20] R.H. Myers, D.C. Montgomery, Response Surface Methodology Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, second ed., JohnWiley and Sons, Inc., New York, (2002).

Google Scholar

[21] Shahrajabian H, Farahnakian M (2013) Modeling and multiconstrained optimization in drilling process of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composite. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 14:1829–1837.

DOI: 10.1007/s12541-013-0245-1

Google Scholar