Nanobubble Transport through Membrane Insert and Agarose Gel

Abstract:

Nanobubbles are gaseous vesicles under 1 micrometer in size, widely used in medical imaging and drug delivery. Their compressibility enhances ultrasound imaging, while their small size allows for extravasation into tumors via the enhanced permeation and retention effect. However, drug delivery remains challenging due to high interstitial pressure within tumors, which limits penetration to the core. To address this, nanobubbles can serve as drug delivery devices, with controlled release triggered by focused ultrasound. Understanding their transport behavior is crucial, particularly in the tumor microenvironment. This study investigates the effect of ultrasound and presence of shear on the permeation of nanobubbles through the tumor interstitium. Rhodamine-loaded nanobubbles, mimicking drug-loaded delivery device, were introduced into a membrane insert system containing an agarose-gel layer simulating the tumor interstitium. Nanobubble concentration in the receiver well was monitored via fluorescence intensity, assessing transport efficiency under different conditions. Comparisons with non-echogenic fluorescent dextrans provided insights into distinct nanoparticle behaviors. Results showed that ultrasound significantly enhanced nanobubble permeation, whereas the presence of shear primarily benefited dextran transport. These findings highlight the unique responsiveness of nanobubbles to ultrasound, offering a promising strategy for improving drug delivery in solid tumors.

• Periodical: Journal of Nano Research (Volume 89)
• Pages: 15-19
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-7BpXya
• Online since: October 2025
• Authors: Charisse Joy Hautea Pescos*, Agata A. Exner, Terence P. Tumolva
• Keywords: Mass Transport, Membrane Insert System, Nanobubble, Permeation

References

[1] Nirmalkar, N.; Pacek, A. W.; Barigou, M. On the existence and stability of bulk nanobubbles. Langmuir (2018), 34, 10964-10973

DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01163

[2] Singh, B.; Shukla, N.; Cho, C.-H.; Kim, B. S.; Park, M.-H.; Kim, K. Effect and Application of Micro- And Nanobubbles in Water Purification. (2021)

DOI: 10.1007/s13530-021-00081-x

[3] Khan P, Zhu W, Huang F, Gao W, Khan NA. Micro–nanobubble technology and water-related application. Water Supply (2020), 20(6), 2021-35

DOI: 10.2166/ws.2020.121

[4] Jin, N.; Zhang, F.; Cui, Y.; Sun, L.; Gao, H.; Pu, Z.; Yang, W. Environment-friendly surface cleaning using micro-nano bubbles. Particology (2022)

DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2021.07.008

[5] Patel, A. K.; Singhania, R. R.; Chen, C.-W.; Tseng, Y.-S.; Kuo, C.-H.; Wu, C.-H.; Dong, C. D. Advances in micro-and nano bubbles technology for application in biochemical processes. Environ Technol Innov (2021), 23, 101729.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101729

[6] Hernandez, C.; Gulati, S.; Fioravanti, G.; Stewart, P. L.; Exner, A. A. Cryo-EM visualization of lipid and polymer-stabilized perfluorocarbon gas nanobubbles-a step towards nanobubble mediated drug delivery.  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces (2017), 7(1), 13517.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13741-1

[7] Li H, Chen G, Yin L, An Y, Zhang J, Zhang H, Zhang D. Ultrasound Enhanced Imaging and Cells Sonoporation of Nanobubbles. J Med Imaging (2016), 6(5), 1227-32

DOI: 10.1166/jmihi.2016.1903

[8] Jain, R.K. Transport of molecules in the tumor interstitium: a review. Cancer research, (1987) 47(12), pp.3039-3051.

[9] Baxter, L. T., & Jain, R. K.. Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors. I. Role of interstitial pressure and convection. Microvascular research, (1989) 37(1), 77-104.

DOI: 10.1016/0026-2862(89)90074-5