Development of Calcium Phosphate Mineralized Silk for Potential Use in Guided Bone Regeneration: Preparation and Properties

Article Preview

Abstract:

Silk has been used in biomedical applications for centuries. The potential of silk for application in tissue engineering is currently being explored. The purpose of this study was to develop new method of mineralizing silk with carbonate apatite and determine cell response. The cocoons were placed in sodium bicarbonate solution and heat treated. The treated silk fibers were mineralized with carbonate apatite (CHA) using precipitation and new microwave methods. The mineralized and non-mineralized silks were characterized using SEM, EDS, XRD, FT-IR, and TGA. Cell response to mineralized silk and non-mineralized silk was determined using human osteoblast like cells (MG-63). The microwave method was more efficient than the precipitation method in terms of the amount of minerals incorporated with the silk and time required for mineralization. EDS, FT-IR and XRD identified CHA in the mineralized silk. In terms of cell response, greater production of type 1 collagen was observed with CHA mineralized silk compared with non-mineralized silk.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 396-398)

Pages:

653-657

Citation:

Online since:

October 2008

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2009 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] W.R. Moore, S.E. Graves, G.I. Bain. Synthetic bone graft substitutes. ANZ J. Surg. 2001; 71, 345-361.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02128.x

Google Scholar

[2] G.H. Altman et al. Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials 2003; 24(3): 401-416.

Google Scholar

[3] Unger RE. et al. Endothelialization of a non-woven silk fibroin net for use in tissue engineering: growth and gene regulation of human endothelial cells. Biomaterials 200 4; 25(21): 5137-5146.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.040

Google Scholar

[4] LeGeros RZ. Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials calcium phosphates. Clin Orthopaed Rel Res 2002; 395: 81-98.

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200202000-00009

Google Scholar

[5] B. Alliot-Licht, G.L. DeLange, M. Gregoire. Effects of hydroxyapatite particles on periodontal ligament fibroblast-like cell behavior. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 158-165.

DOI: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.2.158

Google Scholar

[6] A. Boyde, A. Corsi, R. Quarto, R. Cancedda, P. Biance; Osteoconduction on large macroporous hydroxyapatite ceramic implants: evidence for a complementary integration and disintegration mechanism. Bone 1999; 24: 579-589.

DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00083-6

Google Scholar

[7] S. Sofia, M.B. Mccarthy, G. Gronowicz, D.L. Kaplan. Functionalized silk-based biomaterials for bone formation. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 54: 139-148.

DOI: 10.1002/1097-4636(200101)54:1<139::aid-jbm17>3.0.co;2-7

Google Scholar

[8] R.Z. LeGeros. Apatites in biological system. Prog Crystal Growth Charact 4: 1-45.

Google Scholar

[9] T. Sakae, A. Ookubo, R.Z. LeGeros. Bone formation induced by several carbonate and fluoride containing apatite implanted in dog mandible. Key Engineer Mat 2003; 240-242 : 395-398.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.240-242.395

Google Scholar