Low-Pressure Magnetic Susceptibility Study in λ-(BETS)2GaCl4

Article Preview

Abstract:

We have measured the pressure dependence of Tc and superconducting volume fraction in λ-(BETS)2GaCl4. The sample was put inside a pressure cell with Tin used as the manometer and was measured by SQUID magnetometer. We confirmed the formation of a superconducting dome structure in comparison with resistivity measurement reported in [M. Ueno, et al., Interactions 245, 71 (2024)]. The systematic suppression of the upturn anomaly from the resistivity measurement within 0.13 < P < 0.28 GPa was observed followed with the increase in the superconducting volume fraction at 0.13(1) GPa, before then decrease in slightly pressure at P = 0.32(2) GPa indicates the possible scenario of quantum criticality in the narrow pressure region. We described in detail how to determine the pressure from the manometer and the origin of suppression in superconducting volume fraction in correlation with the pressure dependence of resistivity which shows a clear deviation from normal Fermi liquid. A possible scenario related to a quantum phase transition in a narrow pressure region is discussed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1152)

Pages:

75-81

Citation:

Online since:

June 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C. Proust and L. Taillefer, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 409-429 (2019).

Google Scholar

[2] R.A. Cooper, et al., Science. 323, 1165015 (2009)

Google Scholar

[3] R. H. McKenzie, Science 278, 5339.820 (1997)

Google Scholar

[4] H.Oike et al., Phys. Rev Lett 114, 067002 (2015).

Google Scholar

[5] H. Taniguchi, et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 113709 (2007).

Google Scholar

[6] Oike., H., et al., Nat. Commun. 8, 00941-6 (2017).

Google Scholar

[7] D. P. Sari, et al., Phys. Rev. B 104, 224506 (2021).

Google Scholar

[8] T. Kobayashi, A. Kawamoto., Phys. Rev. B 96, 125115 (2017).

Google Scholar

[9] M. Ueno, et al., Interactions 245, 71 (2024).

Google Scholar

[10] Shaw, R.W., et al., Phys. Rev. 120, 120.88 (1960).

Google Scholar

[11] Jennings, L.D, and Swenson C.A., Phys. Rev. 112, 112.31(1958).

Google Scholar

[12] H. Kobayashi, et al., Chem. Rev 104, 5265-88 (2004).

Google Scholar

[13] Jacko, A.C., et al., Nat. Phys, 5, 1249 (2009).

Google Scholar

[14] Sawada et al., Phys. Rev. B 103, 045112 (2021).

Google Scholar

[15] H. Aizawa, et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87, 093701 (2018).

Google Scholar

[16] N. Doiron-Leyraud, et al., Phys. Rev. B 80, 214531 (2009).

Google Scholar

[17] H. Tanaka et.al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 4, 760-768 (1999).

Google Scholar

[18] T. Kobayashi, et al., Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023075 (2020).

Google Scholar