Osteoconductive Nanocomposite Materials for Bone Regeneration

Article Preview

Abstract:

Bone defect is one of the most important problem in orthopaedic therapy in which application of a biomaterial filling is necessary. Such material should be biocompatible, osteoconductive and porous as well as bioactive and compatible with the bone tissue. Subject of the work was investigations on nanocomposite membrane materials which consisted on synthetic polymer – poly-e-caprolactone (PCL) matrix and ceramic nanoparticles; tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and silica (SiO2) as a nano-filler. The nanocomposite membrane materials were produced by two-step dispersion of the nanoparticles in the biopolymer matrix. Characteristic of nanoparticles were made using transmission electron microscope (TEM), distribution of nanoparticles size (DLS) and specific surface area (BET). The morphology of nanocomposites and homogenous distribution of nanoadditives were made using scanning electron microscope with EDS analysis. Introduction of the nanofillers into the polymer matrix was monitored by thermal analysis method (TG-DCS). It was shown that the TCP nanoparticles affected stronger pore size and distribution but also the polymer structure (crystallity, physicochemical properties of the surface). Treatment of the nanocomposite samples in the simulated body fluid (SBF) induced some changes on the surface of the material containing bioactive ceramic nanoparticles. The results of the tests with SBF showed that the material is able to produce apatite structure on its surface (EDS analysis)

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 730-732)

Pages:

38-43

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Kikuchi, Y. Koyama, Y. Yoshihisa, Y. Imamura, T. Okada, N. Shirahama, Biomaterials 25 (2004) 5979-5986

Google Scholar

[2] Aslan M. Simsek G. Dayi E. J. Contemp Dent Pract 5 (2004) 1-7

Google Scholar

[3] K. Fuijhara, M. Kotaki, S. Ramakrishna, Biomaterials 26 (2005) 4139-4147

Google Scholar

[4] Ramakrishna S, Mayer J, Wintermantel E, Leong KW. 2001 Comp. Sci. Technol. 61 1189

Google Scholar

[5] Doyle C, Tanner ET, Bonfeld W 1991 Biomaterials 12 841

Google Scholar

[6] Kokubo T, Kim HM, Kawashita M 2003 Biomaterials 24 2161

Google Scholar

[7] A.L. Oliveira, I.B. Leonor, P.B. Malafaya, C.M. Alves, H.S. Azevedo, R.L. Reis, Key Engineering Materials; 240-242 (2003) 111-142

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.240-242.111

Google Scholar

[8] T. Kwakami, M. Antoh, H. Hasegawa, T. Yamagashi, M. Ito, S. Eda, Biomaterials; 13 (1992) 759-763

Google Scholar

[9] O. Zinger, G.Zhao, Z. Schwartz, J. Simpson, M.Wieland, D. Landolt, B. Boyan, Biomaterials; 26 (2005) 1837–1847

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.035

Google Scholar

[10] I. Kotela, J. Podporska, E. Sołtysiak, K. J. Konsztowicz, M. Błażewicz, Ceram.Int. (35) 2475–2480 (2009)

Google Scholar

[11] E. Stodolak, K. Gadomska, A. Lacz, M. Bogun, Journal of Physics, 146 (2009) 012026

Google Scholar

[12] T. Kokubo, H.M. Kim, M. Kawashita. Biomaterials; 24 (2003) 2161–75.

Google Scholar

[13] X. Liu, C. Ding, P.K. Chu. Biomaterials; 25 (2004) 1755–61.

Google Scholar

[14] S. Yu, K.P. Hariram, R. Kumar, P. Cheang, K.K. Aik. Biomaterials; 26 (2005) 2343–52.

Google Scholar

[15] T. Kokubo, H. Takadam, Biomaterials 27 (2006) 2907–2915

Google Scholar

[16] P.U. Rokkanen, O. Böstman, E. Hirvensalo, E.A. Mäkelä, E.K. Partio, H. Pätiälä. Biomaterials; 21 (2000) 2607–13.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00128-9

Google Scholar