Decomposition of Ethanethiol by a Corona Radical Injection System

Article Preview

Abstract:

The decomposition of ethanethiol by a corona radical injection system, using water vapor and O3 as radical source, was investigated. It is found that only 83.6% of ethanethiol can be decomposed in dry air flow with relative humidity of 13.4%. A proper quantity of water vapor injection can improve the decomposition efficiency, but which is not always increased. The maximum decomposition efficiency of 99.1% can be obtained in wet air flow with relative humidity of 74.7%. 97.6% of ethanethiol can be decomposed when the relative humidity of gas flow is 51.6%, but it is found that only 76.3% of element sulfur is converted to SO2, based on sulfur balance. However, the conversion efficiency of sulfur to SO2 increases obviously with the increasing of O3 injection. The decomposition efficiency of ethanethiol and conversion efficiency of sulfur to SO2 can reach 99.8% and 95.3% respectively, when O3 is injected into the reactor by high voltage electrode tubes with concentration of 1 g/m3 and flow rate of 300 L/h. The decomposition products are SO2, CO2 and H2O, while no organic product is found, based on which the decomposition mechanism is discussed. The weakest chemical bond C-S in ethanethiol molecule is firstly decomposed to ·SH and ·C2H5 radicals. ·SH can be oxidized to elemental sulfur and SO2, and ·C2H5 is oxidized to CO2 and H2O.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

48-53

Citation:

Online since:

May 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Z. G. Li, Y. Li, P. Cao, et al. Surface Decontamination of Chemical Agent Surrogates Using Atmospheric Pressure Air Flow Plasma Jet.Plasma Science & Technology, 15(2013) 696-701.

DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/15/7/17

Google Scholar

[2] Z. Xiao, D. Xu, C. Hao, et al. High concentration xylene decomposition and diagnostic analysis by non-thermal plasma in a DBD reactor. Plasma Sci. Technol., 19(2017) 064009.

DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa632c

Google Scholar

[3] A. M. Vandenbroucke, R. Morent, N. D. Geyter, et al. Non-thermal plasmas for non-catalytic and catalytic VOC abatement. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 195(2011) 30-54.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.060

Google Scholar

[4] F. Wang, H. Yi, X. Tang. Removal of NO Using a Dielectric Barrier Discharge Reactor in a Cycled Adsorption–Desorption and Decomposition System. Arab J. Sci. Eng., 42(2017)1463-1474.

DOI: 10.1007/s13369-016-2344-7

Google Scholar

[5] J. S. Chang, K. Urashima, Y. X. Tong, et al. Simultaneous removal of NOx and SO2 from coal boiler flue gases by DC corona discharge ammonia radical shower systems: Pilot plant tests. Journal of Electrostatics, 57(2003) 313-323.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3886(02)00168-7

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Liu, R. Zhang, H. Hou, et al. NO reduction using low-temperature SCR assisted by a DBD method. Plasma Sci. Technol., 20(2018) 014002.

DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aa9326

Google Scholar

[7] S. Kambara, Y. Kumano, K. Yukimura. DeNOx characteristics using two staged radical injection techniques. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 16(2009) 778-784.

DOI: 10.1109/tdei.2009.5128518

Google Scholar

[8] J. P. Sarrette, O. Eichwald, F. Marchal, et al. Electro-Hydrodynamics and Kinetic Modeling of Dry and Humid Air Flows Activated by Corona Discharges. Plasma Sci. Technol. 18(2016) 469-472.

DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/18/5/04

Google Scholar

[9] L. Montulli. Binary ionization technology (BITTM) the new surface and air bio/chem decontamination system. 6th Joint Service Chemical and Biological Decontamination Conference, Tucson, USA, (2005).

Google Scholar

[10] Z. G. Li, Z. Hu, Y. Li, et al. Removal of ethyl mercaptan by nonequilibrium plasma. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 28 (2009) 698-702.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Sun, Y. Wu, J. L. Zhang, et al. Emission spectra of hydroxyl radical generated in air corona discharge. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 25(2005) 108-112.

Google Scholar

[12] R. Li, X. Liu. Active species injection in flue gas denitrification. Chem. Eng. Sci., 55(2000) 2481-2489.

DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(99)00487-x

Google Scholar

[13] J. J. Ruan, W. Li, Y. Shi, et al. Decomposition of simulated odors in municipal wastewater treatment plants by a wire-plate pulse corona reactor. Chemosphere, 59(2005) 327-333.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.025

Google Scholar

[14] X. Yan, Y. Sun, T. Zhu, et al. Conversion of carbon disulfide in air by non-thermal plasma. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 261(2013) 669-674.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.043

Google Scholar

[15] Z. G. Li, Z. Hu, H. L. Xi, et al. Predictive model of decontamination efficiency of gaseous pollutant by non-equilibrium plasma. Journal of Electrostatics, 68(2010) 390-393.

DOI: 10.1016/j.elstat.2010.05.010

Google Scholar

[16] X. J. Ma, Z. C. Wu, M. H. Zhou, et al. Electrochemical scission of C-S bond in ethanethiol on a modified β–PbO2 anode in aqueous solution. Seperation and Purification Technology, 109(2013) 72-76.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.02.030

Google Scholar