Effect of Laser Shock Peening on Surface Residual Stress and Plastically Affected Depth of TC11 Titanium Alloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

The confined laser shock peening (LSP) is an innovative surface treatment technique designed to improve the fatigue performance of materials by imparting compressive residual stresses into materials. A 3D finite element model was developed to predict the surface residual stress and plastically affected depth of the TC11 titanium alloy after LSP. The modeling procedure consists of two successive explicit analysis steps. The performance of finite element model was verified by comparing simulated results with the experimental data. With the validated finite element model, the influence of the process parameters (LSP path, thickness of the sample, number of impacts) was investigated on the surface residual stress and plastically affected depth of the TC11 titanium alloy after LSP. Some simulated results can be used to mentor the optimization of the process parameters of LSP.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

20-25

Citation:

Online since:

January 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Liu C Y, Chu C L, Zhou W H, et al. :Key Engineering Materials. Trans Tech Publications, 2009, 407: 608-611.

Google Scholar

[2] DW Sokol, AH Clauer, R. Ravindranath,: Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference (ASME/JSME2004). San Diego, (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] Gujba A. K. and Medraj M.: Materials 7 (2014), 7925-7974.

Google Scholar

[4] Lim H., Kim P., Jeong H. and Jeong S. :Journal of Materials Processing Technology 212 (2012),1347-1354.

Google Scholar

[5] Luo K Y, Wang C Y, Li Y M, et al. :Applied Surface Science, 2014, 313: 600-606.

Google Scholar

[6] Yang Y, Zhang H, Qiao H. :Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2017,722:509-516.

Google Scholar

[7] Golden P J, Shepard M J. :Materials science and engineering: a, 2007, 468: 15-22.

Google Scholar

[8] Hua Y.Q., Bai Y.C., Ye Y.X., et al.:Applied Surface Science 283 (2013), 775-780.

Google Scholar

[9] Braisted W. and Brockman R. :International Journal of Fatigue 21 (1999), 719-724.

Google Scholar

[10] Hfaiedh N., Peyre P., Song H., et al. :International Journal of Fatigue 70 (2015) 480-489.

Google Scholar

[11] Vasu A., Hu Y. and Grandhi R.V. :Surface & Coatings Technology 235 (2013) ,648-656.

Google Scholar

[12] Fabbro R., Fournier J., Ballard P., et al.: Journal of Applied Physics 68 (1990), 775-784.

Google Scholar

[13] Johnson, Gordon R., and William H. Cook. : Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics. Vol. 21. No. 1. (1983).

Google Scholar

[14] Chen M, Niu Q L, An Q L, et al. :Key Engineering Materials. Trans Tech Publications, 2014, 589: 140-146.

Google Scholar

[15] Peyre P, Hfaiedh N, Song H, et al. : International Journal of Structural Integrity, 2011, 2(1): 87-100.

Google Scholar

[16] Cellard C, Retraint D, François M, et al. :Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2012, 532: 362-372.

Google Scholar

[17] Wu X, Huang C, Wang X, et al. : International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2011, 38(5): 322-329.

Google Scholar

[18] Ling X, Peng W, Ma G. : Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2008, 130(2): 021201.

Google Scholar