Microstructure of 7N01 Aluminum Alloy Microalloyed with Er and Zr in the Homogenization Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

The microstructure and segregation of 7N01 aluminum alloy microalloyed with Er and Zr before and after homogenization process at 470 °C for 24 h have been investigated using transmission electron microscope (TEM), and scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscope (EDS) and transmission electron detecter (STEM). SEM images and EDS line scan results showed that there were dendritic segregation of Mg and Zn and micron-sized primary phases along dendrites in the as-cast alloy. The primary phases were mainly Al2Mg3Zn3 containing Al, Zn, Mg and Mn. And a small amount of primary phases were the particles containing Al, Zn, Mg, Mn, Cr and Er and the particles containing Al, Zn, Mg, Er, Mn, Fe and Cr. After homogenization at 470°C for 24 h, dendritic segregation of Mg and Zn was eliminated, Al2Mg3Zn3 and the particles containing Al, Zn, Mg and Mn were basically dissolved. The particles containing Al, Zn, Mg, Mn, Cr and Er and the particles containing Al, Zn, Mg, Er, Mn, Fe and Cr remained. Meanwhile, TEM and STEM images showed that a large number of secondary phases appeared after the homogenization, which were mainly distributed in the inter-dendrite area. EDS results showed that the block-shaped and rod-shaped phases with the width of 10-70 nm and length of 100-500 nm were the particles containing Al, Cr and Mn or Al, Mg, Cr and Mn, and the ellipsoid secondary phase with the size of 50-100 nm was MgZn2.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

123-129

Citation:

Online since:

May 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. K. Berg, et al. GP-zones in Al–Zn–Mg alloys and their role in artificial aging. Acta Materialia 49.17 (2001) 3443-3451.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(01)00251-8

Google Scholar

[2] M. Dumont, et al. Characterization of the composition and volume fraction of η' and η precipitates in an Al–Zn–Mg alloy by a combination of atom probe, small-angle X-ray scattering and transmission electron microscopy. Acta Materialia 53.10 (2005) 2881-2892.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.004

Google Scholar

[3] Jingling Ma, and J. Wen. Corrosion analysis of Al–Zn–In–Mg–Ti–Mn sacrificial anode alloy. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 496.1-2 (2010) 0-115.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.02.174

Google Scholar

[4] Mondal, Chandan, and A. K. Mukhopadhyay. On the nature of T(Al2Mg3Zn3) and S(Al2CuMg) phases present in as-cast and annealed 7055 aluminum alloy. Materials Science & Engineering A (Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing) 391.1-2 (2005) 367-376.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.013

Google Scholar

[5] Yu, Xin Xiang, et al. Solidification behavior and elimination of undissolved Al2CuMg phase during homogenization in Ce-modified Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Rare Metals (2018).

DOI: 10.1007/s12598-018-1172-1

Google Scholar

[6] M. Conserva, E. D. Russo, and O. Caloni. Comparison of the influence of chromium and zirconium on the quench sensitivity of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys. Metallurgical Transactions 2.4 (1971) 1227-1232.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02664256

Google Scholar

[7] D. S. Thompson, B. S. Subramanya, and S. A. Levy. Quench rate effects in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys. Metallurgical Transactions 2.4 (1971) 1149-1160.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02664247

Google Scholar

[8] Seok Park Dong, B. O. Kong, and S. W. Nam. Effect of mn-dispersoid on the low-cycle fatigue life of Al-Zn-mg alloys. Metallurgical & Materials Transactions A 25.7 (1994) 1547-1550.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02665487

Google Scholar

[9] S.Y, Park, W.J. Difference in the Hot Compressive Behavior and Processing Maps between the As-cast and Homogenized AI-Zn-Mg-Cu (7075) Alloys. Journal of Materials Science & Technology 32.7 (2016) 660-670.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2016.04.006

Google Scholar

[10] Yun Lai Deng, et al. Microstructural evolution of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy during homogenization. Journal of Materials Science 46.4 (2011) 875-881.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-010-4828-2

Google Scholar

[11] Czurratis, P., et al. The effect of additions of Mn and Cr and the applied solidification technique on the structure of an Al-2.2 at% Zn-1.4 at% Mg alloy. Physica Status Solidi A 108.1 (1988) 171-182.

DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2211080116

Google Scholar

[12] Eivani, A. R., et al. Evolution of Grain Boundary Phases during the Homogenization of AA7020 Aluminum Alloy. Metallurgical & Materials Transactions A 40.3 (2009) 717-728.

DOI: 10.1007/s11661-008-9741-9

Google Scholar

[13] Kim, K. C., and S. W. Nam. Effects of Mn-dispersoids on the fatigue mechanism in an Al–Zn–Mg alloy. Materials Science & Engineering A (Structural Materials:, Properties, Microstructure and Processing) 244.2 (1998) 257-262.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(97)00548-0

Google Scholar

[14] Li, X. M., and M. J. Starink. Identification and analysis of intermetallic phases in overaged Zr-containing and Cr-containing Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys. Journal of Alloys & Compounds 509.2 (2011) 0-476.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.09.064

Google Scholar