First-Principles Analysis on Interaction between Dopant (Ga, Sb) and Contamination Metal Atoms in Ge Crystals

Article Preview

Abstract:

The lowest energetic configurations of metal impurities in 4th row (Sc - Zn), 5th row (Y - Cd) and 6th row (Hf - Hg) elements in Ge crystals were determined with density functional theory calculations. It was found that the substitutional site is the lowest energetic configuration for most of the calculated metals in Ge. The most stable configurations of dopant (Ga, Sb) - metal complexes in Ge crystals were also investigated. Following results were obtained. (1) For Ga dopant, 1st neighbor T-site is the most stable for metals in group 3 to 7 elements while substitutional site next to Ga atom is the most stable for metals in group 8 to 12 elements. (2) For Sb dopant, substitutional site next to Sb atom is the most stable for all calculated metals. Binding energies of the interstitial metal Mi with the substitutional dopant Ds were obtained by the calculated total energies. The calculated results for Ge were compared with those for Si.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volumes 205-206)

Pages:

417-421

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C. Claeys and E. Simoen, Germanium-based Technologies: From Materials to Devices, Elsevier, Amsterdam, (2007).

Google Scholar

[2] R. Hoelzl, M. Blietz, L. Fabry and R. Schmolk, Semiconductor Silicon 2002, pp.608-625.

Google Scholar

[3] K. Matsukawa, Dr. Thesis of Osaka University, (2006).

Google Scholar

[4] K. Sueoka, K. Kamimura and S. Shiba, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering (2009) Article ID 309209.

Google Scholar

[5] W. Kohn and L. Sham, Phys. Rev. A140 (1965) 1133.

Google Scholar

[6] The CASTEP code is available from Accelrys Software Inc.

Google Scholar

[7] D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B41 (1990) 7892.

Google Scholar

[8] J. Perdew, K. Burke and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3865.

Google Scholar

[9] S. Kümmel and L. Kronik, Rev. Mod. Phys., 80 (2008) 3.

Google Scholar

[10] J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria and M. Ernzerhof, J. Chem. Phys., 118 (2003) 8207, and erratum ibid, 124 (2006) 219906.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2204597

Google Scholar

[11] E. R. Weber, Appl. Phys. Lett., A30 (1983) 1.

Google Scholar