Characterization of Cavitation in Ultrasonic or Megasonic Irradiated Gas Saturated Solutions Using a Hydrophone

Abstract:

Emerging ultrasonic and megasonic cleaning demands in various applications (solar cell, storage devices, wafer and mask cleaning, etc.) dictate the need to understand the acoustic cavitation under different operating conditions to optimize efficiency of cleaning and reduce damage. Major parameters that affect cavitation include frequency of the sound field, operating power of the transducer and the cleaning chemistry. Previous studies have reported the use of common techniques such as multi-bubble sonoluminescence [1] and sono-electrochemistry [2] to understand acoustic cavitation. The disadvantage with sonoluminescence technique is that it characterizes cavitation mainly in the bulk of the solution, which may not be pertinent to wafer cleaning applications where the interest is in understanding cavitation phenomena close to the wafer surface. Although, sono-electrochemical techniques employing microelectrode are capable of measuring cavitation in the vicinity of a solid surface, they are limited to measurements on an extremely small area due to the miniscule size (5-25 μm) of the electrode. In this context, hydrophone measurements offer significant benefit as they can be taken near a solid surface as well as on a relative large area (1-2 mm diameter) of the pressure sensitive tip.

• Periodical: Solid State Phenomena (Volume 219)
• Pages: 165-169
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.219.165
• Online since: September 2014
• Authors: M. Zhao*, R. Balachandran, P.R. Madigappu, P. Yam, C. Zanelli, R. Sierra, M. Keswani
• Keywords: Cavitation, Feature Damage, Hydrophone, Megasonic, Ultrasonic, Wafer Cleaning

References

[1] M. Hauptmann, S. Brems, H. Struyf, P. Mertens, M. Heyns, S. Gendt, and C. Glorieux, Time-resolved monitoring of cavitation activity in megasonic cleaning systems, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 83, p.034904/1-11 (2012).

DOI: 10.1063/1.3697710

[2] M. Keswani, S. Raghavan and P. Deymier, Characterization of transient cavitation in gas sparged solutions exposed to megasonic field using cyclic voltammetry, Microelectro. Eng., 102, pp.91-97 (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2011.11.013

[3] J. Frohly, S. Labouret, C. Bruneel, I. Looten-Baquet, and R. Torguet, Ultrasonic cavitation monitoring by acoustic noise power measurement, Acoust. Soc. Am., 108, 5, Pt. 1, pp.2012-2020 (2000).

DOI: 10.1121/1.1312360

[4] L. Liu, Y. Yang, P. Liu and W. Tan, The influence of air content in water on ultrasonic cavitation field, Ultrason. Sonochem., 21, pp.566-571 (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.10.007

[5] S. Kumari, M. Keswani, S. Singh, M. Beck, E. Liebscher, P. Deymier and S. Raghavan, Control of Sonoluminescence Signal in Deionized Water Using Carbon Dioxide, Microelectronic Engineering, 88, pp.3437-3441 (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2010.10.036

[6] S. Kumari, M. Keswani, S. Singh, M. Beck, E. Liebscher, P. Deymier and S. Raghavan, Control of Sonoluminescence in Carbon Dioxide Containing DI Water at Near Neutral pH Conditions, 10th International Symposium on Ultra Clean Processing of Semiconductor Surfaces, Solid State Phenomena, Trans Tech Publications, 187, pp.177-180 (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.187.177

[7] S. Kumari, M. Keswani, S. Singh, M. Beck, E. Liebscher, L. Toan, and S. Raghavan, Effect of Dissolved CO2 in De-ionized Water in Reducing Damage During Megasonic Cleaning in MegPie, ECS Transactions, 41, 5, pp.93-99 (2011).

DOI: 10.1149/1.3630831

[8] M. Keswani, S. Raghavan, R. Govindarajan, and I. Brown, Measurement of Hydroxyl Radicals in Wafer Cleaning Solutions Irradiated with Megasonic Waves, Microelectronic Engineering, 118, pp.61-65 (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2013.12.028