The Effect of Different Oxidants on Extraction of Uranium from Low Grade Ore

Abstract:

The effect of different oxidants on extraction of uranium from low grade ore was studied. Leaching was performed using sulfuric acid solutions at a concentration of 10 to 30%. Ferric sulfate Fe₂(SO₄)₃, ammonium persulphate (NH₄)₂S₂O₈, and potassium permanganate KMnO₄ at different concentrations were used as oxidants in different variants of the experiment. In addition, solutions collected at Vostok deposit containing 6.86 g/L Fe³⁺ and 10⁶ cells/mL of the bacteria Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans were used for leaching. The rate of uranium extraction with sulfuric acid solutions without oxidants was low and did not exceed 19.4%. Addition of oxidants made it possible to increase rate of uranium extraction. In the presence of ferric sulfate, ammonium persulphate, and potassium permanganate rates of uranium extraction were up to 68, 95.2, and 69.6%, respectively. The rate of uranium leaching in the experiments with the AMD sample was high and reached about 95%. Therefore, it can be concluded that using not only oxidizing agents, but AMD, which are formed during the natural oxidation of sulfide minerals contained in the ore of the deposit, can significantly increase the rate of uranium recovery.

• Periodical: Solid State Phenomena (Volume 299)
• Pages: 1104-1108
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.299.1104
• Online since: January 2020
• Authors: Ashimkhan T. Kanayev, Khussain Valiyev, Aleksandr Bulaev*
• Keywords: Acidophilic Microorganisms, Hydrometallurgy, Molybdenum, Uranium

References

[1] Information on http://www.rfcaratings.kz.

[2] T. Norgate, N. Haque, P. Koltun. The impact of uranium ore grade on the greenhouse gas footprint of nuclear power, Journal of Cleaner Production, 84 (2014) 360-367.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.034

[3] J. West. Decreasing Metal Ore Grades: Are They Really Being Driven by the Depletion of High-Grade Deposits, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15(2) (2011) 165-168.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00334.x

[4] J. Petersen. Heap leaching as a key technology for recovery of values from low-grade ores – A brief overview, Hydrometallurgy, 165 (2016) 206-212.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.09.001

[5] Information on http://www.world-nuclear.org.

[6] D. Lunt, P. Boshoff, M. Boylett, Z. El-Ansary. Uranium extraction: the key process drivers, The J. of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 107 (2007) 419-426.

[7] J. Huang, M. Li, X. Zhang, C. Huang, X. Wu, Extraction of uranium from tailings by sulfuric acid leaching with oxidants, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 69 (2017) 012050.

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/69/1/012050

[8] R. Venter, M. Boylett. The evaluation of various oxidants used in acid leaching of uranium, Hydrometallurgy Conference 2009, Southern African Inst. Mining and Metallurgy, (2000) 445-456.

[9] D.N. Kolomiets, L.D. Troshkina, M.V. Sheremet'ev, L.V. Konopleva. Sorption of uranium from sulfuric acid leaching solutions by strongly basic anion exchangers, Russ. J. Appl. Chem., 78(5) (2016), 722–726.

DOI: 10.1007/s11167-005-0379-8

[10] Abhilash, B.D. Pandey, Microbially Assisted Leaching of Uranium - A Review, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review: An International Journal, 34(2) (2013), 81-113.

DOI: 10.1080/08827508.2011.635731

[11] A. Akcil, S. Koldas, J. Acid Mine Drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies, Cleaner Production, 14 (2006), 1139–1145.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.09.006