Fail-to-Open Short Circuit Failure Mode of SiC Power MOSFETs: 2-D Thermo-Mechanical Modeling

Article Preview

Abstract:

The short-circuit (SC) performance of Silicon Carbide (SiC) power MOSFETs has been extensively characterized in recent years. During a SC event, a SiC power MOSFET experiences a thermo-mechanical (TM) stress originating from a high temperature change during the SC event and the different coefficients of thermal expansions (CTEs) of source metallization, polySilicon gate, SiC and gate-source insulator. High temperature and TM stress cause the aluminum source metallization to melt, and a crack to form and grow within the gate-source insulation, leading to a short connection between the gate and source terminals typically referred to as fail-to-open (FTO) failure mode. This paper presents a 2-D thermo-mechanical (TM) model of a 2-D MOSFET half-cell for assessing the TM stress in the gate-source insulating layer during SC including the phase change behavior and the temperature-dependent properties of the source metallization. The developed modeling approach allows to assess how different metallization thicknesses and materials affect the TM stress of the gate-source insulation and, hence, enables the development of device design guidelines for improving SC withstand time of SiC power MOSFETs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] B. Kakarla, et al. Materials Science Forum, vol. 924, Trans Tech Publications, Ltd., June 2018, p.782–785.

Google Scholar

[2] F. Loche-Moinet, et al., in Proceedings of 24th International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multi-Physics Simulation and Experiments in Microelectronics and Microsystems (EuroSimE), 2023, pp.1-7.

DOI: 10.1109/eurosime56861.2023.10100834

Google Scholar

[3] K. Yao, et al., IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 67, no. 10, pp.4328-4334, 2020.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Liu, et al., IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 41, no. 1, pp.103-106, Jan. 2020.

Google Scholar

[5] Kailun Yao, et al., Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 122, 2021, 114163

Google Scholar

[6] F. Richardeau, F. Boige, Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 100–101, 2019, 113501.

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Pascal, et al., in Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Integrated Power Packaging (IWIPP), 2019, pp.137-142.

Google Scholar

[8] E. Sarraute, et al., in Proceedings of 24th International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multi-Physics Simulation and Experiments in Microelectronics and Microsystems (EuroSimE), 2023, pp.1-8

DOI: 10.1109/eurosime56861.2023

Google Scholar

[9] Rex B. et al., Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 48, no. 7, pp.603-606, 1987.

Google Scholar

[10] Leitner, M., Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 48, p.3036–3045 (2017)

Google Scholar

[11] I. Kovacevic-Badstuebner et al., in Proceedings of IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS), 2023.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Tsibizov et. al., IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 35, pp.1855-1865, 2020.

Google Scholar

[13] M. Leitner et al., Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 48, no. 6, p.3036–3045, 2017.

Google Scholar

[14] Frank Hille et al., Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 64, 2016, pp.393-402.

Google Scholar

[15] Shengde Zhang, et al., Procedia Engineering, vol. 10, 2011, pp.1497-1502.

Google Scholar

[16] Xi Jiang, et al., Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 88–90, pp.593-597, 2018.

Google Scholar