Prediction of Post-Machining Distortion Due to Residual Stresses Using FEM and a Massive Removal Approach

Article Preview

Abstract:

In aeronautics weight reduction of aircrafts has become one of the main objectives. This has led to the fact that a majority of the aeronautical parts made from aluminium are large monolithic parts (to avoid the use of assembling systems like rivets and screws). The manufacturing of these aeronautic parts, especially the structural parts, is usually performed by machining. On large aluminium aeronautical parts, the main factor which can lead to non-compliance of a part is the re-equilibrium of the initial residual stresses inside the workpiece during the machining process. In this paper, an example of multi-sided machining of a part made of AIRWARE® 2050 alloy is realised. Simulations of the machining of this part have been performed using a specific finite element tool which has been specially developed to predict the distortion due to the redistribution of these initial residual stresses during machining. Results numerically obtained are then compared with experimental results, showing a good agreement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 611-612)

Pages:

1159-1165

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Yang, Y., Li, M., and Li, K. (2013) The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology pp.1-9.

Google Scholar

[2] Das, S. and Chandra, U. (1999) Residual Stress and Distortion, in Handbook of Aluminum Metallurgy: Processes and Equipment, volume 1, G. E. Totten and D. S. Mackenzie, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY.

Google Scholar

[3] Sim, W. (2010) International Journal of Microstructure and Materials Properties 5, 446-455.

Google Scholar

[4] Chenot, J. (1989) In Computational Plasticity: Models, Software and Applications Proceedings of the Second International Conference Held in Barcelona, Spain : pp.793-816.

Google Scholar

[5] Ma, K., Goetz, R., and Svrivatsa, S. (2010) ASM Handbook, Metals Process Simulation 22B, 386-407.

Google Scholar

[6] Lequeu, P., Smith, K., and Danielou, A. (2010) Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 19(6), 841-847.

Google Scholar

[7] Cerutti, X., Hassini, S., Duc, E., and Mocellin, K. (2013) volume 768 - 769, Proceedings of the International Conference on Residual Stresses 9 (ICRS 9) : pp.398-405.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.768-769.398

Google Scholar

[8] Coupez, T., Digonnet, H., and Ducloux, R. (2000) Applied Mathematical Modelling 25(2), 153 - 175.

DOI: 10.1016/s0307-904x(00)00045-7

Google Scholar

[9] Fourment, L., Chenot, J. L., and Mocellin, K. (1999) International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 46(9), 1435-1462.

Google Scholar