[1]
D. M. Caughey and R. E. Thomas: Proc. IEEE (1967), p.2192.
Google Scholar
[2]
W. J. Schaffer, G.H. Negley, K. G. Irvine and J.W. Palmour: Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 339. (1994) p.595.
Google Scholar
[3]
G. Wellenhofer and U. Rössler: physica status solidi (b) Vol. 202, (1997) p.107.
Google Scholar
[1]
20 30 60 90 300K 200K Hole Mobility Ratio(µ(θ)/µ(45 o ) <1100> <0001> j µ<1-100> /µ<0001>=1. 15 Angle (degree) θ.
Google Scholar
[1]
2 0 30 60 90 300K 200K 100K Mobility Ratio(µ(θ)/µave) Angle (degree) <1100> <0001> j θ µ<1-100> /µ<0001>=0. 83 Electron Figures 4: Anisotropy of electron and hole mobilities in )0211( face Journal Title and Volume Number (to be inserted by the publisher) 5 Corresponding author: tetsuo2. hatakeyama@toshiba. co. jp, Phone: +81-44-549-2142, Fax: +81-44-520-1501.
Google Scholar