The Nature of the Shallow Boron Acceptor in SiC - Localization versus Effective Mass Theory

Uwe Gerstmann; Adam Gali; Peter Deák; Thomas Frauenheim; Harald Overhof

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.457-460.711

Paper Titles

High Phonon-Drag Thermoelectric Efficiency of SiC at Low Temperatures
p.693

As-Grown and Process-Related Defects in Schottky Barrier Diodes Fabricated on Bulk Off-Axis n-Type 6H-SiC
p.697

Impact Ionization in α-SiC and Avalanche Photoamplifiers
p.701

Electrical Study of Fast Neutron Irradiated Devices Based on 4H-SiC CVD Epitaxial Layers
p.705

The Nature of the Shallow Boron Acceptor in SiC - Localization versus Effective Mass Theory
p.711

The Solubility and Defect Equilibrium on the n-Type Dopants Nitrogen and Phosphorus in 4H-SiC: A Theoretical Study
p.715

Uniform Axial Charge Carrier Concentration in PVT-Grown p-Type 6H SiC by Non-Uniform Distribution of Boron in the Powder Source
p.719

In-Situ Er-Doping of SiC Bulk Single Crystals
p.723

Growth of Phosphorous-Doped n-Type 6H-SiC Crystals using a Modified PVT Technique and Phosphine as Source
p.727

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vols. 457-460The Nature of the Shallow Boron Acceptor in SiC -...

The Nature of the Shallow Boron Acceptor in SiC - Localization versus Effective Mass Theory

Abstract:

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Silicon Carbide and Related Materials 2003

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 457-460)

Pages:

711-714

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.457-460.711

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2004

Authors:

Uwe Gerstmann, Adam Gali, Peter Deák, Thomas Frauenheim, Harald Overhof

Keywords:

Aluminum (Al), Boron, Density Function Theory (DFT), EMT, LDA, Silicon Carbide (SiC)

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] H. Woodbury and G.W. Ludwig, Phys. Rev. 124, 1083 (1961).

Google Scholar

[2] A.G. Zubatov, I.M. Zaritzkii, S.N. Lukin, E.N. Mokhov, and V.G. Stepanov, Sov. Phys. Solid State 27, 2085 (1985).

Google Scholar

[3] R. M¨uller, M. Feege, S. Greulich-Weber, J. -M. Spaeth, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 8, 1377 (1993).

Google Scholar

[4] P. De´ak, B. Aradi, A. Gali, U. Gerstmann, and W.J. Choyke, Mat. Sci. Forum 433-436 (ECSCRM2002), 481 (2003).

Google Scholar

[5] S. Greulich-Weber, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 162, 95 (1997).

Google Scholar

[6] T. Matsumoto, O.G. Poluektov, J. Schmidt, E.N. Mokhov, and B.G. Baranov, Phys. Rev. B 55, 2219 (1997).

Google Scholar

[7] M. Bockstedte, A. Mattausch, and O. Pankratov, Mater. Sci. Forum 353-356, 447 (2001).

Google Scholar

[8] W. Suttrop, G. Pensl, and P. Lanig, Appl. Phys. A 51, 231 (1990).

Google Scholar

[9] O. Gunnarsson, O. Jepsen, and O.K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B 27, 7144 (1983).

Google Scholar

[10] U. Gerstmann and H. Overhof, Physica B, 308-310, 561 (2001).

Google Scholar

[11] G. A. Baraff and M. Schl¨uter, Phys. Rev. B 30, 3460 (1984).

Google Scholar

[12] M. S. Hybertsen and S. G. Louie Phys. Rev. B 34, 5390 (1986).

Google Scholar

[13] R. W. Godby, M. Schl¨uter, and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. B 37, 10159 (1988).

Google Scholar

[14] N. T. Son, privat communication (2003).

Google Scholar

[15] B. Aradi, A. Gali, P. D´eak, J. E. Lowther, N. T. Son, E. Janzen, and W. J. Choyke, Phys. Rev. B 63, 245202 (2001).

Google Scholar