Interface Defects and Negative Bias Temperature Instabilities in 4H-SiC PMOSFETs – A Combined DCIV/SDR Study

Article Preview

Abstract:

We study the structure of SiC/SiO2 interface defects and the effects of negative bias temperature stress (NBTS) in lateral 4H silicon carbide (SiC) PMOSFETs. Our devices have 90 nm thick SiO2 gate oxides thermally grown in N2O ambient at 1280°C on n-type SiC. We investigate virgin (unstressed) and stressed devices using two different techniques: (i) for electrical characterization, we use the direct-current current-voltage (DCIV) technique [1] which measures a recombination current via interface defects and charge pumping (CP) which measures the number of interface defects within a certain range of the SiC band gap; (ii) to study the structure of the defects, we use electrically detected magnetic resonance (EDMR) via spin dependent recombination (SDR) [2]. The elevated temperature during NBTS is provided by in-situ heated test structures. This is the first EDMR study of p-doped SiC MOSFETs and the first negative bias temperature instability (NBTI) study of SiC MOSFETs using in-situ (on-chip) heating during stress.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 740-742)

Pages:

529-532

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Neugroschel, C.T. Sah, K.M. Han, M.S. Carroll, T. Nishida, J.T. Kavalieros, Y. Lu, IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 42 (1995) 1657-1662.

DOI: 10.1109/16.405281

Google Scholar

[2] D.J. Lepine, Phys. Ref. B 6 (1972) 436-441.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Umeda, K. Esaki, R. Kosugi, K. Fukuda, T. Ohshima, N. Morishita, J. Isoya, Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 (2011) 142105-1-142105-3.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3644156

Google Scholar

[4] C.J. Cochrane, P.M. Lenahan, A.J. Lelis, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 (2012) 023509-023511.

Google Scholar

[5] J.T. Ryan, P.M. Lenahan, T. Grasser, H. Enichlmair, Proc. IRPS Conf. (2010) 43-49.

Google Scholar

[6] J.P. Campbell, P.M. Lenahan, C.J. Cochrane, A.T. Krishnan, S. Krishnan, IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Reliab. 7 (2007) 540-557.

DOI: 10.1109/tdmr.2007.911379

Google Scholar

[7] D.K. Schroder, Proc. ISDRS Conf. (2009) 1-2.

Google Scholar

[8] A.J. Lelis, R. Green, D.B. Habersat, Mat. Sci. Forum 679-680 (2011) 599-602.

Google Scholar

[9] T. Grasser, B. Kaczer, W. Goes, T. Aichinger, P. Hehenberger, M. Nelhiebel, Proc. IRPS Conf. (2009) 33-44.

Google Scholar

[10] T. Grasser, B. Kaczer, W. Goes, H. Reisinger, T. Aichinger, P. Hehenberger, P. -J. Wagner, F. Schanovsky, J. Franco, M.T. Luque, M. Nelhiebel, IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 58 (2011) 3652-3666.

DOI: 10.1109/ted.2011.2164543

Google Scholar

[11] T. Aichinger, M. Nelhiebel, T. Grasser, Microelectron. Reliab. 48 (2008) 1178-1184.

Google Scholar

[12] T. Aichinger, M. Nelhiebel, S. Einspieler, T. Grasser, IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Reliab. 10 (2010) 3-8.

Google Scholar

[13] J. A Weil, J.R. Bolton, J.E. Wertz, Wiley Interscience, New York, (1994).

Google Scholar

[14] I.V. Ilyin, M.V. Muzafarova, E.N. Mokhov, P.G. Baranov, S.B. Orlinskii, J. Schmidt, Physica B 340 (2003) 128-131.

DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2003.09.053

Google Scholar