Materials and Methods of Contraception

Article Preview

Abstract:

Contraception means interference in the process of ovulation, fertilization or implantation. This is an old practice and dates back to ancient times and continues to modify and remodify itself according to the social customs and demands of the society. This chapter discusses various forms and methods of contraception, their efficacy, advantages and disadvantages of their use, their importance in present scenario and their impact on the society. Unwanted pregnancies and their termination attempt can be hazardous if not dealt in proper way, so avoidance of pregnancy is considered the best way out for physical and mental health of the patient and thereby focuses the importance of contraception practice and health education.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

137-148

Citation:

Online since:

October 2016

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Contraception. (n. d. ) Dorland's Medical Dictionary for Health Consumers. (2007). Retrieved January 7. (2016).

Google Scholar

[2] Himes NE: Medical History of Contraception, 1936. Reprint. New York, Gamut Press, (1963).

Google Scholar

[3] Hopkins K: Contraception in the Roman Empire. Comparative Studies in Society and History 13: 124, (1965).

Google Scholar

[4] Potts, M, Campbell, M, Glob. libr. Women's med. (ISSN: 17562228) 2009; DOI10. 3843/ GLOWM. 10376.

Google Scholar

[5] http: /www. searo. who. int/entity/health_situation_trends/data/mnch_unmet-needs-of contraceptives / en.

Google Scholar

[6] Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use Fifth edition 2015 WHO.

Google Scholar

[7] J. Trussell , Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception. 83 (2011) 397-404.

DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.021

Google Scholar

[8] J. Eur, Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2 (1997) 105-11.

Google Scholar

[9] C. Van der Wijden, J. Kleijnen, T. Van den Berk, Lactation amenorrhea for family planning. Cochrane Database Systsx 12 (2003) CD001329.

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001329

Google Scholar

[10] J. Trussell, Contraceptive efficacy, in: R.A. Hatcher, J. Trussell, A. L. Nelson, W. Cates Jr., D. Kowal, M.S. Policar (Eds), Contraceptive technology (20th revised ed. ) New York, 2011 Ardent Media. p.779–863.

DOI: 10.2307/2137913

Google Scholar

[11] M. Manders, L. McLindon, B. Schulze, M.M. Beckmann, J.A. Kremer, C. Farquhar, Timed intercourse for couples trying to conceive, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 3 (2015) CD011345. PMID 25775926.

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011345

Google Scholar

[12] Sam Rowlands, New technologies in contraception, International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 116 (2008) 230-239.

Google Scholar

[13] C. Mauck, L.H. Glover, E. Miller et al, Lea's Shield: a study of the safety and efficacy of a new vaginal barrier contraceptive used with and without spermicide, Contraception. 1996 53 (1996) 329-35.

DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(96)00081-9

Google Scholar

[14] Clinic, Mayo. Spermicide (Vaginal Route),. Mayo Clinic. Retrieved April 1, (2014).

Google Scholar

[15] ContraceptiveUse2011. http: /www. un. org/esa/population/publications/contraceptive2011/ contraceptive 2011. htm (Accessed on March 20, 2014).

Google Scholar

[16] K.J. Buhling, N.B. Zite, P. Lotke et al, Worldwide use of intrauterine contraception: a review, Contraception. 89 (2014) 162.

DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.011

Google Scholar

[17] L. Hui-Qin, F. Zhuan-Chong , W. Yu-Bao, H. Yiao-Lin, H. Van Kets, D. Wildemeersch, Adv. Contracept. 15 (1999) 201-9.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1006797316253

Google Scholar

[18] T.M. Farley, M.J. Rosenberg, P.J. Rowe, J.H. Chen, O. Meirik, Lancet, Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective. 339 (1992) 785-8.

DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91904-m

Google Scholar

[19] R.A. Hatcher, J. Trussell, A.L. Nelson, W.J. Cates, D. Kowal, M.S. Policar, Contraceptive technology. 20th ed. New York, (2012).

Google Scholar

[20] Long-term reversible contraception. Twelve years of experience with the TCu380A and TCu220C. Contraception. 56 (1997) 341–52.

DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(97)00186-8

Google Scholar

[21] X. Xiong, P. Buekens, Wollast, EIUD use and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis of case-control studies, Contraception. 52 (1995) 23-34.

DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(95)00120-y

Google Scholar

[22] J.W. Goldzieher, H.W. Rudel, How the oral contraceptives came to be developed. J. Am. Med. Ass. 230 (1974) 421–425.

DOI: 10.1001/jama.230.3.421

Google Scholar

[23] A.J.W. Hsueh, E. J. Peck, J. H. Clark, Control of uterine estrogen receptor levels by progesterone, Endocrinology. 98 (1976) 438-444.

DOI: 10.1210/endo-98-2-438

Google Scholar

[24] B. Diana, M.D. Petitti, M.P.H. N Engl, J. Med. 349 (2003) 1443-1450.

Google Scholar

[25] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Implants. MMWR 62 (2013) 14-15.

Google Scholar

[26] D.R. Mishell, Pharmacokinetics of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception, J Reprod. Med. 41(1996) 381.

Google Scholar

[27] A.S. Viola, S. Castro, N.M. Marchi, et al. Long-term assessment of forearm bone mineral density in postmenopausal former users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, Contraception. 84 (2011) 122.

DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.11.007

Google Scholar

[28] J.S. Jones, Percutaneous vasectomy: a simple modification eliminates the steep learning curve of no-scalpel vasectomy, J. Urol. 169 (2003) 1434-6.

DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000047366.58553.1c

Google Scholar

[29] Male and female sterilisation. London (UK): Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG); 2004. Jan, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) p.114. (Evidence-based Clinical Guideline; no 4).

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-94186-5_985

Google Scholar

[30] H.B. Peterson, Z. Xia, J.M. Hughes, L.S. Wilcox, L.R. Tylor, J. Trussell, The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 174 (1996) 1168.

DOI: 10.2307/2137928

Google Scholar

[31] I.D. Sharlip, A.M. Belker, S. Honig, M. Labrecque, J.L. Marmar, L.S. Ross, et al. Vasectomy: AUA guideline. J Urol. 188 (2012) 2482.

DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.080

Google Scholar

[32] Emma Hitt (18 June 2010). FDA Panel Gives Ulipristal Acetate Unanimous Positive Vote for Emergency Contraception Indication,. Retrieved 2010-06-22.

Google Scholar

[33] P. Stratton, E.D. Levens, B. Hartog, J. Piquion, Q. Wei, M. Merino et al., Endometrial effects of a single early-luteal dose of the selective progesterone receptor modulator CDB-2914, Fertil. Steril. 93 (2010) (2035).

DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.057

Google Scholar

[34] J. Trussell, G. Rodriguez, C. Ellertson, Updated estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception, Contraception. 59 (1999) 147.

DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00018-9

Google Scholar

[35] WHO/HRP Levonorgestrel is more effective, has fewer side-effects, than Yuzpe regimen, Prog. Hum. Reprod. Res. 51 (1999) 3.

Google Scholar

[36] G. Piaggio, Z. Heng, H. von Hertzen, X. Bilian, C. Linan, Combined estimates of effectiveness of mifepristone 10 mg in emergency contraception, Contraception. 68 (2003) 439.

DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(03)00110-0

Google Scholar

[37] RCOG Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, Clinical Effectiveness Unit (January 2012). Clinical guidance: emergency contraception (PDF). London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. ISSN 1755-103X. Retrieved 2012-04-30. p.3.

Google Scholar