Surface Cleaning of Graphene by CO2 Cluster

Article Preview

Abstract:

Graphene has attracted researchers due to its unique physical properties [1]. However, residues on surface can act as contaminants which further have adverse effects on its performance. As synthetic graphene has inherent surface roughness which can also affect the weak adhesion of layers and leakage points. In order to improve the mechanical and electrical properties, the graphene surface should be uncontaminated. In general practice wet cleaning methods, containing hazardous chemical and solvents are used to remove the residues from graphene surface [2, 3]. To avoid chemicals, mechanical cleaning of graphene using contact mode atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been tried. However, the contact mode AFM cleaning is a limited in cleaning area and the cleaning procedure takes a long time. Recently, CO2 cluster cleaning shows benefits that overcomes these problems. Herein we report the use of CO2 cluster to clean the graphene surface without affecting its inherent properties for the first time. The CO2 cluster treated graphene samples were evaluated by AFM for its roughness change and residual contamination.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 219)

Pages:

68-70

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] X. Liang, B. A. Sperling, I. Calizo, G. Cheng, C.A. Hacker, Q. Zhang, Y. Obeng, K. Yan, H. Peng, Q. Li, X. Zhu, H. Yuan, A.R. Hight Walker, Z. Liu, L. -m. Peng and C.A. Richter: ACS Nano 5 (11) (2011), pp.9144-9153.

DOI: 10.1021/nn203377t

Google Scholar

[2] X. Li, W. Cai, J. An, S. Kim, J. Nah, D. Yang, R. Piner, A. Velamakanni, I. Jung, E. Tutuc, S. K. Banerjee, L. Colombo and R. S. Ruoff: Science 324 (5932) (2009), pp.1312-1314.

DOI: 10.1126/science.1171245

Google Scholar

[3] S. Bae, H. Kim, Y. Lee, X. Xu, J. -S. Park, Y. Zheng, J. Balakrishnan, T. Lei, H. Ri Kim, Y. I. Song, Y. -J. Kim, K. S. Kim, B. Ozyilmaz, J. -H. Ahn, B. H. Hong and S. Iijima: Nat Nano 5 (8) (2010), pp.574-578.

DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2010.132

Google Scholar

[4] A. Kulkarni, H. Kim, R. Amin, S. Park, B. H. Hong, and T. Kim: Jounal of Naniscuence and Nanotechnology 12 (5) (2012), pp.3909-3017.

Google Scholar

[5] H. Choi, H. Kim, D. Yoon, J. W. Lee, B. -K. Kang, M. -S. Kim, J. -G. Park, S. -B. Kwon and T. Kim: Microelectronic Engineering 102 (0) (2013), pp.87-90.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2011.12.007

Google Scholar