Design and Mechanical Characterization of Auxetic 2D Scaffolds and Application to Native Tissues

Article Preview

Abstract:

The selection of biomaterials and the design of the scaffold is crucial, as it directly influences the mechanical properties, which in turn affect cell behavior and tissue integration. This study investigates how scaffold geometry impacts mechanical characteristics, with the aim of replicating the properties of natural tissues. Auxetic geometries, characterized by negative Poisson’s ratios, were investigated. These structures exhibit unique mechanical behavior, expanding laterally when stretched, in contrast to conventional materials that contract. The Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) technique was used to 3D print scaffolds with a single filament of polycaprolactone (PCL). Two geometries, wavy and sinusoidal, were analyzed by varying the amplitude of the curve within each structural cell. Tensile tests were performed to measure mechanical properties, including Young’s Modulus (E), Poisson’s ratio (ν), and porosity-properties critical for understanding the interaction of scaffolds with cells and tissues. The wavy geometry exhibited a higher E than the sinusoidal geometry at the same amplitude. At a minimum amplitude of 0.3 mm, the wavy structure had E = 6.8 MPa, while the sinusoidal structure had E = 3.8 MPa. At the maximum amplitude of 1.2 mm, the wavy structure had E = 0.6 MPa, and the sinusoidal structure had E = 0.2 MPa. All Poisson’s ratios were negative, with the lowest value (-1.56) observed in the sinusoidal structure at the largest amplitude. The detected negative Poisson’s ratio suggests auxetic behavior, which could enhance scaffold flexibility, improve its ability to deform, promote cell attachment, and facilitate tissue integration. Although the two auxetic structures shared the same undulation angle, the analysis revealed differences in their mechanical properties. Specifically, the wavy structure exhibited a lower Young’s Modulus. To improve cell interaction and attachment by reducing pore size, a correction factor was calculated based on stiffness values and pore area measurements. By adjusting the scaffold geometry, its mechanical properties can be fine-tuned to more closely align with the characteristics of native tissues, potentially enhancing cell attachment and proliferation. This study highlights the potential of modifying scaffold geometry, particularly through the use of auxetic structures, to significantly influence mechanical properties. This approach shows promise in optimizing scaffolds for tissue engineering applications.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

105-121

Citation:

Online since:

June 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Chia and B. Wu, "Recent advances in 3d printing of biomaterials," Journal of Biological Engineering, vol. 9, Mar. 2015.

DOI: 10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4

Google Scholar

[2] A. Soufivand, N. Abolfathi, A. Hashemi, and S. Lee, "Prediction of mechanical behavior of 3d bioprinted tissue–engineered scaffolds using finite element method (fem) analysis," Additive Manufacturing, vol. 33, p.101181, Mar. 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101181

Google Scholar

[3] J. Williams, A. Adewunmi, R. Schek, et al., "Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffoldsfabricatedviaselectivelasersintering,"Biomaterials,vol.26,p.4817–27,Sep.2005.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.057

Google Scholar

[4] F. Tallia, L. Russo, S. Li, et al., "Bouncing and 3d printable hybrids with self–healing properties," Mater. Horiz., vol. 5, p.849–860, 5 2018. DOI: 10.1039/C8MH00027A. [Online]. Available:.

DOI: 10.1039/C8MH00027A

Google Scholar

[5] B. Duan, E. Kapetanovic, L. Hockaday, and J. Butcher, "3d printed trileaflet valve conduits using biological hydrogels and human valve interstitial cells," Acta biomaterialia, vol. 10, Dec. 2013.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.005

Google Scholar

[6] R. Morrison, S. Hollister, M. Niedner, et al., "Mitigation of tracheobronchomalacia with 3d– printed personalized medical devices in pediatric patients," Science translational medicine, vol. 7, 285ra64, Apr. 2015.

DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3010825

Google Scholar

[7] W. Lee, J. C. Debasitis, V. K. Lee, et al., "Multi–layered culture of human skin fibroblasts and keratinocytes through three–dimensional freeform fabrication," Biomaterials, vol. 30, no. 8, p.1587–1595, 2009, ISSN: 0142–9612. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials. 2008.12.009. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0142961208009800.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.009

Google Scholar

[8] J. J. Chung, H. Im, S. H. Kim, J. W. Park, and Y. Jung, "Toward biomimetic scaffolds for tissue engineering: 3d printing techniques in regenerative medicine," Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, vol. 8, p.586406, 2020, ISSN: 2296–4185. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020. 586406. [Online]. Available: https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC7671964.

DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.586406

Google Scholar

[9] ASTM, "Iso/astm 52900:2021; additive manufacturing — general principles— terminology," Standard, 2021.

DOI: 10.31030/3290011

Google Scholar

[10] E. De Giglio, M. A. Bonifacio, A. Ferreira, et al., "Multi-compartment scaffold fabricated via 3d-printing as in vitro co-culture osteogenic model," Scientific Reports, vol. 8, Oct. 2018.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-33472-1

Google Scholar

[11] S. Todros, M. Todesco, and A. Bagno, "Biomaterials and their biomedical applications: From replacement to regeneration," Processes, vol. 9, Nov. 2021, ISSN: 2227–9717. DOI: 10.3390/ pr9111949. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2227--9717/9/11/1949.

DOI: 10.3390/pr9111949

Google Scholar

[12] M. DÁngelo, E. Benedetti, M. G. Tupone, et al., "The role of stiffness in cell reprogramming: A potential role for biomaterials in inducing tissue regeneration," Cells, vol. 8, p.1036, Sep. 2019.

DOI: 10.3390/cells8091036

Google Scholar

[13] M. S. B. Reddy, D. Ponnamma, R. Choudhary, and K. K. Sadasivuni, "A comparative review of natural and synthetic biopolymer composite scaffolds," Polymers, vol. 13, no. 7, 2021, ISSN: 2073-4360. DOI: 10.3390/polym13071105. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/ 2073-4360/13/7/1105.

DOI: 10.3390/polym13071105

Google Scholar

[14] M. Chelu and A. M. Musuc, "Advanced biomedical applications of multifunctional natural and synthetic biomaterials," Processes, vol. 11, no. 9, 2023, ISSN: 2227-9717. DOI: 10.3390/ pr11092696. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/11/9/2696.

DOI: 10.3390/pr11092696

Google Scholar

[15] R. Breuls, T. Jiya, and T. Smit, "Scaffold stiffness influences cell behavior: Opportunities for skeletal tissue engineering," The open orthopaedics journal, vol. 2, p.103–9, Feb. 2008.

DOI: 10.2174/1874325000802010103

Google Scholar

[16] C. Guimaraes, L. Gasperini, A. Marques, and R. L. Reis, "The stiffness of living tissues and its implications for tissue engineering," Nature Reviews Materials, vol. 5, Feb. 2020.

DOI: 10.1038/s41578-019-0169-1

Google Scholar

[17] X. Lu, Z. Ding, F. Xu, Q. Lu, and D. Kaplan, "Subtle regulation of scaffold stiffness for optimized control of cell behavior," ACS Applied Bio Materials, vol. 2, Jun. 2019. DOI: 10.1021/ acsabm.9b00445.

DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.9b00445

Google Scholar

[18] A. Gleadall, D. Visscher, J. Yang, D. Thomas, and J. Segal, "Review of additive manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: Relationship between geometry and performance," Burns & Trauma, vol. 6, Jul. 2018, ISSN: 2321-3876.

DOI: 10.1186/s41038-018-0121-4

Google Scholar

[19] T. Luo, B. Tan, L. Zhu, Y. Wang, and J. Liao, "A review on the design of hydrogels with different stiffness and their effects on tissue repair," Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 10, 2022, ISSN: 2296-4185. DOI: [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/.

DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.817391

Google Scholar

[20] P. Mardling, A. Alderson, N. Jordan–Mahy, and C. L. Le Maitre, "The use of auxetic materials in tissue engineering," Biomater. Sci., vol. 8, p.2074–2083, 8 2020. DOI: 10.1039/ C9BM01928F. [Online]. Available:.

DOI: 10.1039/C9BM01928F

Google Scholar

[21] V. Lvov, F. Senatov, A. Veveris, V. Skrybykina, and A. Diaz Lantada, "Auxetic metamaterials for biomedical devices: Current situation, main challenges, and research trends," Materials, vol. 15, p.1–28, Feb. 2022.

DOI: 10.3390/ma15041439

Google Scholar

[22] C. Körner and Y. Liebold–Ribeiro, "A systematic approach to identify cellular auxetic materials," Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 24, Feb. 2015. DOI: 10.1088/0964--1726/24/2/ 025013.

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/24/2/025013

Google Scholar

[23] M. Kapnisi, C. Mansfield, C. Marijon, et al., "Auxetic cardiac patches with tunable mechanical and conductive properties toward treating myocardial infarction," Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 28, May 2018.

DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201800618

Google Scholar

[24] J. Trainini, L. Jorge, M. Beraudo, et al., "Cardiac helical function. fulcrum and torsion," Online Journal of Cardiology Research & Reports, vol. 7, p.1–15, Jan. 2023. DOI: 10.33552/ OJCRR.2023.07.000653.

DOI: 10.33552/ojcrr.2023.07.000653

Google Scholar

[25] R. Gatt, M. Vella Wood, A. Gatt, et al., "Negative poisson's ratios in tendons: An unexpected mechanical response," Acta biomaterialia, vol. 24, Jun. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio. 2015.06.018.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.018

Google Scholar

[26] J. Warner, A. Gillies, H. Hwang, H. Zhang, R. Lieber, and S. Chen, "3d–printed biomaterials with regional auxetic properties," Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol. 76, May 2017.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.05.016

Google Scholar

[27] S. Wu, J. Liu, Y. Qi, et al., "Tendon–bioinspired wavy nanofibrous scaffolds provide tunable anisotropy and promote tenogenesis for tendon tissue engineering," Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 126, p.112181, 2021, ISSN: 0928–4931. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.msec.2021.112181. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0928493121003209.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112181

Google Scholar

[28] M. Shirzad, A. Zolfagharian, M. Bodaghi, and S. Y. Nam, "Auxetic metamaterials for bone– implanted medical devices: Recent advances and new perspectives," European Journal of Mechanics – A/Solids, vol. 98, p.104905, Dec. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2022. 104905.

DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2022.104905

Google Scholar

[29] J. Liu, X. Yao, Z. Wang, et al., "A flexible porous chiral auxetic tracheal stent with ciliated epithelium," Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 124, p.153–165, Apr. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio. 2021.01.044.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.01.044

Google Scholar

[30] F. Nappi, Angelo, R. Carotenuto, et al., "Stress–shielding, growth and remodeling of pulmonary artery reinforced with scaffold copolymer and transposed into aortic position," Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, vol. 15, Oct. 2016.

DOI: 10.1007/s10237-015-0749-y

Google Scholar

[31] K. Knight, P. Moalli, and S. Abramowitch, "Preventing mesh pore collapse by designing mesh poreswithauxeticgeometries:Acomprehensiveevaluationviacomputationalmodeling,"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 140, Jan. 2018.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4039058

Google Scholar

[32] T. Li, Y. Chen, X. Hu, Y. Li, and L. Wang, "Exploiting negative poissonś ratio to design 3d–printed composites with enhanced mechanical properties," Materials & design, vol. 142, p.247–258, Mar. 2018.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.034

Google Scholar

[33] Y. Yan, Y. Li, L. Song, and C. Zeng, "Pluripotent stem cell expansion and neural differentiation in 3–d scaffolds of tunable poisson's ratio," Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 49, Nov. 2016. DOI: 10. 1016/j.actbio.2016.11.025.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.025

Google Scholar

[34] N. Novak, M. Vesenjak, and Z. Ren, "Auxetic cellular materials - a review," Strojniški vestnik – Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 62, p.485–493, Sep. 2016.

DOI: 10.5545/sv-jme.2016.3656

Google Scholar

[35] H. Chen, D. Baptista, G. Criscenti, et al., "From fiber curls to mesh waves: A platform for fabrication of hierarchically structured nanofibers mimicking natural tissue formation," Nanoscale, vol. 11, Jun. 2019.

DOI: 10.1039/C8NR10108F

Google Scholar

[36] B. Ma, J. Xie, J. Jiang, F. Shuler, and D. Bartlett, "Rational design of nanofiber scaffolds for orthopedic tissue repair and regeneration," Nanomedicine (London, England), vol. 8, p.1459– 81, Sep. 2013.

DOI: 10.2217/nnm.13.132

Google Scholar

[37] S. Camarero Espinosa, H. Yuan, P. Emans, and L. Moroni, "Mimicking the graded wavy structure of the anterior cruciate ligament," Advanced Healthcare Materials, Mar. 2023. DOI: 10. 1002/adhm.202203023.

DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202203023

Google Scholar

[38] S. Ji and M. Guvendiren, "3d printed wavy scaffolds enhance mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis," Micromachines, vol. 11, p.31, Dec. 2019.

DOI: 10.3390/mi11010031

Google Scholar

[39] I. Zein, D. W. Hutmacher, K. C. Tan, and S. H. Teoh, "Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications," Biomaterials, vol. 23, no. 4, p.1169– 1185, 2002, ISSN: 0142-9612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)002320. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0142961201002320.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00232-0

Google Scholar

[40] R. Sala, S. Regondi, and R. Pugliese, "Design data and finite element analysis of 3d printed poly(ε–caprolactone)–based lattice scaffolds: Influence of type of unit cell, porosity, and nozzle diameter on the mechanical behavior," Eng, vol. 3, p.9–23, 2022, ISSN: 2673– 4117. DOI: 10.3390/eng3010002. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4117/3/1/2.

DOI: 10.3390/eng3010002

Google Scholar

[41] A. Gleadall, I. Ashcroft, and J. Segal, "Volco: A predictive model for 3d printed microarchitecture," Additive Manufacturing, vol. 21, Apr. 2018.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.004

Google Scholar

[42] P. Yadav, G. Beniwal, and K. Saxena, "A review on pore and porosity in tissue engineering," Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 44, Feb. 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.661

Google Scholar

[43] J.HernandezandK.Woodrow,"Medicalapplicationsofporousbiomaterials:Featuresofporosity and tissuespecific implications for biocompatibility," Advanced Healthcare Materials, vol. 11, Feb. 2022.

DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202102087

Google Scholar

[44] W. J. Hendrikson, C. A. van Blitterswijk, J. Rouwkema, and L. Moroni, "The use of finite element analyses to design and fabricate three-dimensional scaffolds for skeletal tissue engineering," Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 5, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:20176421.

DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2017.00030

Google Scholar

[45] C. Murphy and F. O'Brien, "Understanding the effect of mean pore size on cell activity in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds," Cell adhesion & migration, vol. 4, p.377–81, Jul. 2010.

DOI: 10.4161/cam.4.3.11747

Google Scholar

[46] I. Buj-Corral, A. Bagheri, and O. Petit-Rojo, "3d printing of porous scaffolds with controlled porosity and pore size values," Materials, vol. 11, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:52099828.

DOI: 10.3390/ma11091532

Google Scholar

[47] Q. L. Loh and C. Choong, "Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: Role of porosity and pore size," Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, vol. 19, May 2013.

DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2012.0437

Google Scholar

[48] T. M. Inc., "Detect kaze features," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://es.mathworks.com/ help/vision/ref/detectkazefeatures.html#References.

Google Scholar

[49] T. M. Inc., "Bwmorph - branchpoint," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://es.mathworks. com/help/images/ref/bwmorph.html.

Google Scholar

[50] C. Smith, R. Wootton, and K. Evans, "Interpretation of experimental data for poissonś ratio of highly nonlinear materials," Exp Mech, vol. 39, p.356–362, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/.

DOI: 10.1007/BF02329817

Google Scholar

[51] W. Saltzman and R. Langer, "Transport rates of proteins in porous materials with known microgeometry," Biophysical Journal, vol. 55, no. 1, p.163–171, 1989, ISSN: 0006-3495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82788-2. [Online]. Available: https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006349589827882.

DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(89)82788-2

Google Scholar

[52] I. Bružauskaitė, D. Bironaitė, and E. Bagdonas E.and Bernotienė, "Scaffolds and cells for tissue regeneration: Different scaffold pore sizes–different cell effects," Cytotechnology, vol. 68(3), p.355–369, 2016, ISSN: 2214-8604.

DOI: 10.1007/s10616-015-9895-4

Google Scholar

[53] Y. Chen, T. Li, F. Scarpa, and L. Wang, "Lattice metamaterials with mechanically tunable poisson's ratio for vibration control," Physical Review Applied, vol. 7, p.024012, Jan. 2017.

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.7.024012

Google Scholar

[54] Z. Yuan and Z. Cui, "Micropolar homogenization of wavy tetra–chiral and tetra–achiral lattices to identify axial–shear coupling and directional negative poissonś ratio," Materials & Design, vol. 201, p.109483, Jan. 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109483

Google Scholar

[55] M. Lei, W. Hong, Z. Zhao, et al., "3d printing of auxetic metamaterials with digitally reprogrammable shape," ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 11, May 2019. DOI: 10.1021/ acsami.9b06081.

DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b06081

Google Scholar

[56] G. Singh and A. Chanda, "Mechanical properties of whole–body soft human tissues: A review," Biomedical Materials, vol. 16, p.062004, Nov. 2021.

DOI: 10.1088/1748-605x/ac2b7a

Google Scholar

[57] G. Pascoletti, M. Di Nardo, G. Fragomeni, et al., "Dynamic characterization of the biomechanical behaviour of bovine ovarian cortical tissue and its short–term effect on ovarian tissue and follicles," Materials, vol. 13, p.3759, Aug. 2020.

DOI: 10.3390/ma13173759

Google Scholar

[58] G. Garoffolo and M. Pesce, "Mechanotransduction in the cardiovascular system: From developmental origins to homeostasis and pathology," Cells, vol. 8, Dec. 2019. DOI: 10.3390/ cells8121607.

DOI: 10.3390/cells8121607

Google Scholar

[59] A. Gleadall, "Fullcontrol gcode designer: Open-source software for unconstrained design in additive manufacturing," Additive Manufacturing, vol. 46, p.102–109, 2021, ISSN: 22148604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102109. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214860421002748.

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102109

Google Scholar

[60] Z. Niu and H. Li, "Research and analysis of threshold segmentation algorithms in image processing," Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1237, no. 2, p.022122, Jun. 2019. DOI: [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1237/2/022122

Google Scholar