Electrical Study of Self-Assembled Ge Quantum Dots Embedded in P-Type Silicon. Temperature Dependent Capacitance Voltage and DLTS Study

Article Preview

Abstract:

The electrical properties of dome-shaped and pyramid-shaped Ge Quantum Dots (QDs) embedded in p-type Silicon are reported. Capacitance-Voltage (T-CV) characteristics are reported for the temperature range of 35 K to 296 K. The T-CV results showed the desired charge carrier density of the Silicon, on the order of 1016 cm-3, at room temperature. Two shoulders are observed in the CV curves between 270 K and 175 K. They are explained as charge stored in the dome- and pyramid-shaped QDs. Below 175 K, only one shoulder is observed in the CV measurements, attributed to charge trapped in dome-shaped QDs. The DLTS study confirms these results. Using a reverse bias between -0.1 V and -1 V two peaks are seen at 50 and 70 K. They are explained in terms of the boron state (the one at 50 K) and charged stored on pyramid-shaped Ge QDs (the one at 70 K). Increasing the reverse bias from -1 V to -1.4 V shows the appearance of a peak around 60 K, attributed to dome-shaped Ge QDs. At the same time, a shoulder appears around 100 K for -1 V, which extends to larger temperatures as the reverse bias magnitude is increased. The activation energies found are around 50 meV (due to Boron), 150 to 250 meV (due to pyramid-shaped Ge QDs), 300 to 350 meV (due to dome-shaped Ge QDs) and 425 meV (due to both dome- and pyramid-shaped Ge QDs).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volumes 178-179)

Pages:

67-71

Citation:

Online since:

August 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D. J. Eaglesham and M. Cerullo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1943 (1990).

Google Scholar

[2] G. Abstreiter, P. Schittenhelm, C. Engel, E. Silveira, A. Zrenner, D. Meertens and W. Jager, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 11, 1521 (1996).

DOI: 10.1088/0268-1242/11/11s/012

Google Scholar

[3] C. M. A. Kapteyn, M. Lion, R. Heitz, D. Bimberg, C. Miesner, T. Asperger, K. Brunner and G. Abstreiter, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 4169 (2000).

DOI: 10.1063/1.1334651

Google Scholar

[4] C. M. A. Kapteyn, M. Lion, R. Heitz, D. Bimberg, C. Miesner, T. Asperger, K. Brunner and G. Abstreiter, Phys. Stat. Sol. B. 224, 261 (2001).

DOI: 10.1002/1521-3951(200103)224:1<261::aid-pssb261>3.0.co;2-3

Google Scholar

[5] V. Lavchiev, R. Holly, G. Chen, F. Schaffler, R. Goldhahn, and W. Jantsch, Opt. Lett. 34, 3785 (2009).

Google Scholar

[6] V.-T. Rangel-Kuoppa and A. Conde-Gallardo, Thin Solid Films 519 (2010) 453.

Google Scholar

[7] V.-T. Rangel-Kuoppa and G. Chen, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 81 (2010) 036102.

Google Scholar

[8] S. M. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, Wiley-Interscience, 1969, p.35, 36,38, 42-44.

Google Scholar

[9] S. K. Zhang, H. J. Zhu, F. Lu, Z. M. Jian and X. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 3340.

Google Scholar