Influence of Different Contact Lengths on the Correct Extraction of the Resistance Parameters of TLM Test Structures on 4H-SiC

Article Preview

Abstract:

Accurate characterization of low-resistance ohmic contacts on 4H-SiC is crucial for devicedevelopment, but is complicated by the limitations of the standard Transfer Length Method (TLM).TLM test structures are widely used for extracting the specific contact resistivity (ρC) between metaland semiconductor layers, as well as the sheet resistance of doped layers. The contact formation pro-cess itself, particularly the annealing step, modifies the SiC layer under the contact. This results in asheet resistance below the contact (RSK) that deviates from the sheet resistance of interest between thecontacts (RSH), which invalidates a key assumption of the standard TLM evaluation of a constant RSHthroughout the whole TLM test structure. This study uses 2D TCAD simulation of TLM test structuresto investigate the influence of the contact length L, while using an advanced evaluation method forextracting ρC with the help of a third contact. Consequently, it is necessary to measure the contactend resistance RCE, which is derived from the potential at the end of the TLM contact. The findingsprovide a deeper understanding of the TLM technique’s robustness and offer valuable guidelines foroptimizing TLM test structures to ensure accurate characterization of ohmic contacts on 4H-SiC.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. Kimoto, Fundamentals of silicon carbide technology. John Wiley & Sons Singapore Pte. Ltd, 2014.

Google Scholar

[2] K. Zekentes and K. Vasilevskiy, Advancing Silicon Carbide Electronics Technology I, vol. 37. Materials Research Forum LLC, 2018.

DOI: 10.21741/9781945291852

Google Scholar

[3] G. K. Reeves and H. B. Harrison, "Obtaining the specific contact resistance from transmission line model measurements," vol. 3, no. 5, pp.111-113, 1982.

DOI: 10.1109/edl.1982.25502

Google Scholar

[4] D. K. Schroder, Semiconductor material and device characterization. IEEE Press and Wiley, 3rd ed. ed., 2006.

Google Scholar

[5] Synopsys, "Sentaurus™ device user guide."[6] S. Oussalah, B. Djezzar, and R. Jerisian, "A comparative study of different contact resistance test structures dedicated to the power process technology," vol. 49, no. 10, pp.1617-1622, 2005.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sse.2005.08.004

Google Scholar

[7] H.-J. Ueng, D. B. Janes, and K. J. Webb, "Error analysis leading to design criteria for transmission line model characterization of ohmic contacts," vol. 48, no. 4, pp.758-766, 2001.

DOI: 10.1109/16.915721

Google Scholar

[8] G. K. Reeves and B. Harrison, "An analytical model for alloyed ohmic contacts using a trilayer transmission line model," vol. 42, no. 8, pp.1536-1547, 1995.

DOI: 10.1109/16.398670

Google Scholar

[9] S. Y. Han, K. H. Kim, J. K. Kim, H. W. Jang, K. H. Lee, N.-K. Kim, E. D. Kim, and J.-L. Lee, "Ohmic contact formation mechanism of ni on n-type 4h-sic," vol. 79, no. 12, pp.1816-1818, 2001.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1404998

Google Scholar

[10] S. Tsukimoto, K. Ito, Z. Wang, M. Saito, Y. Ikuhara, and M. Murakami, "Growth and microstructure of epitaxial ti3sic2 contact layers on sic," vol. 50, no. 5, pp.1071-1075, 2009.

DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.mc200831

Google Scholar

[11] W. M. Loh, S. E. Swirhun, T. A. Schreyer, R. M. Swanson, and K. C. Saraswat, "Modeling and measurement of contact resistances," vol. 34, no. 3, pp.512-524, 1987.

DOI: 10.1109/t-ed.1987.22957

Google Scholar

[12] M. Rommel, A. May, L. Baier, J. Kauth, N. Bottcher, and M. Jank, "Investigation of ohmic contacts and resistances of a 4h-sic cmos technology up to 550 degrees c," vol. 21, no. 4, 2024.

DOI: 10.4071/001c.127390

Google Scholar