4.5-kV 20-mΩ.cm2 Implantation-Free 4H-SiC BJT with Trench Structures on the Junction Termination Extension

Article Preview

Abstract:

A single-mask junction termination extension withtrench structures is formed to realize a 4.5 kV implantation-free 4H-SiCbipolar junction transistor (BJT). The trench structures are formed on the baselayer with dry etching using a single mask. The electric field distributionalong the structure is controlled by the number and dimensions of the trenches.The electric field is distributed by the trench structures and thus the electricfield crowding at the base and mesa edges is diminished. The design isoptimized in terms of the depth, width, spacing, and number of the trenches toachieve a breakdown voltage (VB) of 4.5 kV, which is 85% of thetheoretical value. Higher efficiency is obtainable with finer lithographicresolution leading to smaller pitch, and higher number and narrower trenches.The specific on-resistance (RON) of 20 mΩ.cm2 is measuredfor the small-area BJT with active area of 0.04 mm2. The BV-RONof the fabricated device is very close to the SiC limit and by far exceeds thebest SiC MOSFETs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 821-823)

Pages:

838-841

Citation:

Online since:

June 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Östling, in IEEE IEDM, (2010) 13. 3. 1-13. 3. 4.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Agarwal et al., in 64th Device Research Conference, (2006) 155–158.

Google Scholar

[3] B. Buono et al., IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 57 (2010) 2664–2670.

Google Scholar

[4] S. -H. Ryu et al., IEEE Electron Device Letters, 22 (2001) 124–126.

Google Scholar

[5] C. -F. Huang et al. in 14th ISPSD, (2002) 57–60.

Google Scholar

[6] A. K. Agarwal et al., in 17th ISPSD, (2005) 271–274.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Balachandran et al., in 19th ISPSD, (2007) 293–296.

Google Scholar

[8] Q. Zhang et al., in 21st ISPSD, (2009) 339–342.

Google Scholar

[9] S. Sundaresan et al., in 25th ISPSD, (2013) 303–306.

Google Scholar

[10] H. Miyake et al., IEEE Electron Device Letters, 33 (2012) 1598–1600.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Agarwal et al., in ICSCRM, (2005).

Google Scholar

[12] P. G. Muzykov et al., Microelectronics Reliability, 49 (2009) 32–37.

Google Scholar

[13] J. Zhang et al., Electronic Letters, 40 (2004) 1381–1382.

Google Scholar

[14] R. Ghandi et al., IEEE Electron Device Letters, 29 (2008) 135–1137.

Google Scholar

[15] J. Zhang et al., IEEE Electron Device Letters, 29 (2008) 471–473.

Google Scholar

[16] M. Domeij et al., Materials Science Forum, 645–648 (2010) 1033–1036.

Google Scholar

[17] M. Domeij et al., Materials Science Forum, 717–720 (2012) 1123–1126.

Google Scholar

[18] R. Ghandi et al., IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 58 (2011) 2665–2669.

Google Scholar

[19] Sentaurus TCAD version 10. 0 from Synopsys Inc. [Online]. Available: www. synopsys. com.

Google Scholar

[20] R. Ghandi et al., IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 58 (2011) 259–265.

Google Scholar

[21] L. Lanni, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, (2014), ISBN 978-91-7595-135-5.

Google Scholar