AFM-sMIM Characterization of the Recombination-Enhancing Buffer Layer for Bipolar Degradation Free SiC MOSFETs

Article Preview

Abstract:

Due to the expansion of defects like single Shockley-type Stacking Faults inside the SiC epitaxial drift layer, during high current stress, classical SiC MOSFETs can be victims of the degradation of their electrical characteristics. The introduction of an epitaxial SiC buffer layer between the substrate and the n- drift epilayer, called recombination-enhancing buffer layer, was shown to avoid this degradation. In this paper, TCAD simulations of the electrical behavior of such a commercial SiC MOSFET device with varying buffer layer thickness are studied, indicating only small modifications of the electrical characteristics. These simulations are combined with the characterization of the local electrical properties using an AFM-sMIM technique, allowing to determine the real thickness of the different layers of the device. These measurements highlight an inhomogeneous conductivity in the SiC substrate, being probably compensated by the introduction of the SiC buffer layer.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 361)

Pages:

85-91

Citation:

Online since:

August 2024

Export:

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] N.A. Mahadik et al., Applied Physics Letters, 100(4) (2012)

Google Scholar

[2] K. Konishi et al., Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 114, no 1, p.014504. (2013)

Google Scholar

[3] J.P. Bergman et al., Mater. Sci. Forum, vol. 353 356, pp.299-302, 2001.

Google Scholar

[4] J. D. Caldwell, et al., J. Appl. Phys. 108, 044503, 2010.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Agarwal, et al., IEEE Electron Device Lett. 28, 587, 2007.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Hayashi et al., Appl. Phys. Express, vol. 10, no 8, p.081201. 2017.

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Bu et al., Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 122, no 24, p.244504, 2017.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Kato et al., Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no 1, p.18790, 2022.

Google Scholar

[9] T. Tawara et al., Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 120, no 11, p.115101, 2016.

Google Scholar

[10] K. Konishi et al., AIP Advances, vol. 12, no 3, p.035310, 2022.

Google Scholar

[11] H. Itoh, H., et al., Materials Science Forum,vol. 1004, pp.71-77, (2020)

Google Scholar

[12] S. Friedman, et al., Instrumentation, Metrology, and Standards for Nanomanufacturing, Optics, and Semiconductors VIII, SPIE, 2014.

Google Scholar

[13] R. C. Germanicus et al., Beilstein J. Nanotechnol., vol. 11, no 1, pp.1764-1775, 2020.

Google Scholar

[14] A. Michez, et al., IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 62, no 4, pp.1516-1527, 2015.

Google Scholar