Influence of Annealing Parameters on Surface Roughness, Mobility and Contact Resistance of Aluminium Implanted 4H SiC

Article Preview

Abstract:

The impact of implantation temperature and dose as well as the annealing process with and without a graphite capping layer on surface roughness, carrier mobility and specific contact resistance are investigated and compared. The use of the capping layer is proven to be particularly advantageous: (1) a deterioration of surface roughness can be avoided even for high dose implantations and (2) the specific contact resistance is reduced. Furthermore, it is shown that a capping layer prevents surface contamination during annealing.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 679-680)

Pages:

417-420

Citation:

Online since:

March 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. V. Rao: Solid-State Electronics 47 (2003), 213–222.

Google Scholar

[2] W. Weber, W. Jiang, and S. Thevuthasan: Nucl. Inst. Methods B 175-177 (2001), 26-30.

Google Scholar

[3] M. A. Capano, S. Ryu, J. A. Cooper, Jr., M. R. Melloch, K. Rottner, S. Karlsson, N. Nordell, A. Powell, and D. E. Walker, Jr.: J. Elecron. Mater. 28, 3 (1999), 214-218.

DOI: 10.1007/s11664-999-0016-z

Google Scholar

[4] J. Crofton, S. Mohney, J. Williams, and T. Isaacs-Smith: Solid-State Electronics 46 (2002), 109-113.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Rambach, L. Frey, A. J. Bauer, and H. Ryssel: Mat. Sci. For. 527-529 (2006), 827-830.

Google Scholar

[6] D. K. Schroder: Semiconductor material and device characterization (Wiley, 3rd ed., 2006).

Google Scholar

[7] M. H. Weng, F. Roccaforte, F. Giannazzo, S. Di Franco, C. Bongiorno, M. Saggio, and V. Raineri: Mat. Sci. For. 645-648 (2010), 713-716.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.645-648.713

Google Scholar