[1]
S. Armini, C. Whelan, M. Smet, S. Eslava, and K. Maex: Polymer Journal, 38 (8) (2006), 1.
Google Scholar
[2]
S. Armini, I. Vakarelski, C. Whelan, K. Maex and K. Higashitani: submitted.
Google Scholar
[3]
J. D. Feick, and D. Velegol: Langmuir, 16 (2000), 10315.
Google Scholar
[4]
J. D. Feick, N. Chukwumah, A. E. Noel, and D. Velegol: Langmuir, 20 (2004), 3090.
DOI: 10.1021/la0355545
Google Scholar
[5]
G. L. Holtzer, and D. Velegol: Langmuir, 19 (2003), 4090.
Google Scholar
[6]
S. Armini, R. Burtovyy, I. Luzinov, C. Whelan, K. Maex, and M. Moinpour: submitted. Figure 1. Pull-off force vs. pH for a) polymer, b) composite B and c) composite A particles. Two different sets of experiments are shown. Figure 2. AFM RMS roughness after CMP with different abrasive types in different pH buffer solutions. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -0. 5.
DOI: 10.1557/proc-0991-c08-04
Google Scholar
[3]
0 Pull-off force, nN pH set I (tip1) set II (tip2) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -0. 5.
Google Scholar
[2]
0 Pull-off force, nN pH set I (tip1) set II (tip1) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -0. 2.
Google Scholar
[2]
4 Pull-off force, nN pH set I (tip1) set II (tip1) 0.
Google Scholar
3 Slurry type RMS (nm) PMMA diw PMMA pH 10 PMMA pH 4 B DIW B pH 10 B pH 4 A pH 10 A DIW A pH 4Silica DIW Silica pH 10 Silica pH 4 a b c.
DOI: 10.31030/3264267
Google Scholar